Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85351 (KAR)

SRI PRASAD M TALAGERI S/O MANGESH TALAGERI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

WP/108497/2025 · 2025-11-13

Geetha K B, S G Pandit

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15526-DB WP No. 108497 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 PRESENT THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. WRIT PETITION NO.108497 OF 2025 (S-KAT) BETWEEN: SRI. PRASAD M TALAGERI S/O MANGESH TALAGERI AGED ABOUT 30 YEARS, WORKING AS CIVIL POLICE CONSTABLE, COAST SECURITY POLICE, HONNAVARAA POLICE STATION, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT, R/AT. JOGAMATTE CROSS, NEAR SUBHASH CLINIC, SRINIDHI COMPLEX, HONNAVARAA-581334. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. MARUTHI S., ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, VIDHANA SOUDHA, DR. B.R. AMBEDKAR VEEDHI, BANGALORE 560001. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, COAST (KARAWALI) GUARD POLICE, BANDAR ROAD, MALPE, UDUPI DISTRICT 576108. 3. THE POLICE SUB-INSPECTOR, COAST (KARAWALI) GUARD POLICE STATION, HONNAVARAA POLICE STATION, HONNAVARAA, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT 581334. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. G.K. HIREGOUDAR, PRL. GOVERNMENT ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 30.10.2025 PASSED BY THE HON’BLE KARNATAKA STATE ADMINISTRATIVE TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI BENCH IN APPLICATION NO.11129/2025 (VIDE ANNEXURE-A) & ETC. VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15526-DB WP No. 108497 of 2025 THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT AND THE HON'BLE MRS JUSTICE GEETHA K.B. ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S G PANDIT) Heard the learned counsel Sri. Maruthi S. for the appellant and learned Prl. Govt. Advocate Sri. G.K. Hiregoudar, who takes notice for respondents/State. Perused the entire writ petition papers. 2. The petitioner, who is a Civil Police Constable in Coast Security Police, is before this Court aggrieved by an interim order dated 30.10.2025 in Application No.11129/2025 passed by the Karnataka State Administrative Tribunal, Belagavi1, wherein the petitioner’s interim prayer is rejected on the ground that the applicant has not made out a case for grant of interim order. 1 For short ‘Tribunal’ - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15526-DB WP No. 108497 of 2025 3. The petitioner is before the Tribunal in the above stated application questioning the relieving order dated 23.10.2025 at Annexure-A1. 4. A perusal of the relieving order (Annexure-A1) would indicate that the petitioner has been relieved on the report of PSI on 24.09.2025. It also indicates that the petitioner was negligent in his duty and on account of insubordination, the petitioner is relieved with a direction to report before the Superintendent of Police, Uttara Kannada, Karwar. 5. The Tribunal is justified in recording that the applicant has not made out a case for grant of interim order. Whether the relieving order dated 23.10.2025 is for misconduct or any other reason, is to be determined by the Tribunal on filing the response by the respondents/State. At this stage, whether relieving order is on complaint or whether the petitioner is to be provided an opportunity before relieving, cannot be decided by this Court, which - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15526-DB WP No. 108497 of 2025 shall be decided by the Tribunal. Thus, we do not find any illegality in the impugned order of the Tribunal. There is no merit in the writ petition. Accordingly, the writ petition stands rejected. Pending applications, if any, are disposed of as not surviving for consideration. Sd/- (S G PANDIT) JUDGE Sd/- (GEETHA K.B.) JUDGE JTR CT:VP LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33