Sankar v. The State Represented by, The Inspector of Police,
CRL OP/22302/2025 · 2025-08-12
G Jayachandran
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85329 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85329 (MAD) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 12.08.2025 CORAM
THE HONOURABLE Dr.JUSTICE G.JAYACHANDRAN Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 Sankar, Male (37) S/o Murugesan, No.34, Udayar Street, Pakkamudayan Pet, Lawspet, Puduchery- 605008. ... Petitioner/Accused Vs. The State, Represented by the Inspector of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Viluppuram District Crime No.231/2025. ...Respondent/Complainant PRAYER : Criminal Original Petition filed under Section 482 of Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023, to enlarge the petitioner on bail in the event of arrest by the respondent police in Crime No.231 of 2025 on the file of the Inspector of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Villupuram District, the respondent herein. For Petitioner : Mr.Antony Jesus For Respondent : Mr.S.Udaya Kumar. Government Advocate (Crl. Side) 1/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 O R D E R The petitioner, who apprehends arrest at the hands of the respondent police, for the alleged offence punishable under Section 303(2) of the BNS in Crime No.231 of 2025 on the file of the respondent police, seeks anticipatory bail. 2. According to the complaint, there is a civil dispute between the complainant and the accused persons. While so, the accused had harvested the standing casuarina trees in a portion of the land and had encroached upon the disputed land. 3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner states that already title dispute is pending in the Civil Court and writ petition is also filed in this regard. The said complaint was lodged to wreck vengeance. 4. The learned Government Advocate (Crl.Side) states that the standing casuarina trees, which are removed, are not yet recovered and the petitioner is absconding and not co-operating for the investigation. 2/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025
5. Considering the nature of the offence and the submissions made by the learned counsels, this Court is inclined to grant anticipatory bail to the petitioner. 6.
Accordingly, the petitioner is ordered to be released on bail in the event of his arrest or on his appearance on or before 21.08.2025 before the District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate,Vanur, on condition that the petitioner shall execute a bond for a sum of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees Ten Thousand only) with two sureties, each for a like sum to the satisfaction of the respondent police or police officer, who inteds to arrest, or to the satisfaction
of
the
learned District
Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate,Vanur, failing which the petition for anticipatory bail shall stand dismissed and on further condition; [a]The petitioner shall deposit a sum of Rs.50,000/-(Rupees fifty thousand only) to the credit of the Crime No.231 of 2025 on the file of the District Musnif-cum-Judicial Magistrate,Vanur, on or before
21.08.2025. [b]If the petitioner fails to surrender before the concerned Magistrate, on or before 21.08.2025, this Order shall stand automatically cancelled; [c] the sureties shall affix their photographs and Left Thumb 3/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 Impression in the Application for Surety ship [Judicial Form No.46 annexed to 'The Criminal Rules of Practice, 2019']. The learned Magistrate shall obtain a copy of any one of the identity proofs to ensure their identity; [d] the petitioner shall report before the respondent police daily at 10.00 a.m, for a period of 30 days and thereafter, as and when required for interrogation; [e]the petitioner shall co-operate with the investigation for completing the investigation. [f] On breach of any of the aforementioned conditions, the learned Magistrate/Trial Court is entitled to pass appropriate orders against the petitioner in accordance with law as if the aforementioned conditions have been imposed and the petitioner released on bail by the learned Magistrate/Trial Court himself as laid down by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in P.K.Shaji vs. State of Kerala [(2005)13 SCC 283]; [g] If the accused thereafter absconds, a fresh FIR can be registered under Section 269 of B.N.S. 12.08.2025 ari 4/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 Note :
1.
Registry is directed to forthwith upload this order in the Official Website of this Court. 2. All concerned to act on this order being uploaded in Official Website of this Court without insisting on certified hard copies. To be noted, this order when uploaded in the official website of this Court will be watermarked and will also have a QR code. To 1.The District Munsif-cum-Judicial Magistrate, Vanur. 2.The Inspector of Police, Kiliyanur Police Station, Viluppuram District. 3.The Public Prosecutor, High Court of Madras. 5/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis
Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 Dr.G.JAYACHANDRAN, J. ari Crl.O.P.No.22302 of 2025 12.08.2025 6/6 https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis