158 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-21542-2025 Date of Decision: July 31, 2025 M/S SUKHMANI ENGINEERS AND STONE CRUSHER ....Petitioner Versus STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTEHRS ..... Respondents CORAM:- HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE LISA GILL HON'BLE MRS. JUSTICE MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA Present: Mr. Mansur Ali, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. R.S. Pandher, Addl. AG, Punjab. **** LISA GILL, J. 1. One of the primary arguments raised by learned counsel for the petitioner is that impugned order dated 15.07.2025 (Annexure P-7) is an absolutely non-speaking and cryptic order passed without any jurisdiction. 2. It is further informed that operation of notification dated 17.03.2025 empowering the Superintending Engineers, Drainage-cum-Mining, Punjab, has been stayed by Co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 29.07.2025 passed in CWP No.21086 of 2025. RITU SHARMA 2025.08.06 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-21542-2025 -2- 3. Learned counsel for the respondents, on the basis of communication dated 30.07.2025, which is taken on record subject to just exceptions, submits that he has specific instructions to the effect that impugned order dated 15.07.2025 shall be withdrawn and a fresh speaking order shall be passed by the competent Authority in accordance with law after affording an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 4. Keeping in view facts and circumstances as above including the specific statement made as above by learned counsel for the State, it is directed that necessary action be taken and fresh speaking order be passed expeditiously by the competent Authority in terms of the statement made before us. 5. Writ petition is disposed of accordingly. 6. It is clarified that there is no expression of opinion on the merits of matter. (LISA GILL) JUDGE (MEENAKSHI I. MEHTA) July 31, 2025 JUDGE Rts Whether speaking/reasoned: Yes/No Whether reportable: Yes/No RITU SHARMA 2025.08.06 10:55 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document