[2025:RJ-JP:11313] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2852/2025 Manohar Bishnoi S/o Dhimaram, Aged About 25 Years, R/o Village Sonadi Tehsil Sedwa, Police Station Sedwa, District Barmer Presently At Plot No. 08, Ekta Nagar F Block, Gandhipath West, Jaipur Police Station Karni Vihar Jaipur- West (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through Special PP ----Respondent Connected With S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2850/2025 Jagdish Bishnoi S/o Bhakraram, Aged About 33 Years, R/o Village Sodani Tehsil Sedwa, Police Station Sedwa, District Badmer Presently At Plot No. 08, Ekta Nagar F Block, Gandhipath West, Jaipur Police Station Karni Vihar Jaipur- West (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined In Central Jail Jaipur). ----Accused-Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajat Singh Solanki, Adv. For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP with Mr. Shubham Sain, AAAG HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 11/03/2025 1. Defect(s) pointed out by the Registry is waived in S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2850/2025. 2. These instant bail applications have been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioners, who have been arrested [2025:RJ-JP:11313] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2852/2025] in connection with FIR No.88/2025 registered at Police Station Karni Vihar, District Jaipur (West) for the offences punishable under Sections 8/22 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioners that the accused-petitioners have falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that alleged recovered contraband MDA (8.79 gms) is below commercial quantity. He further submits that trial of the case will take considerable time in its conclusion. He argues that the petitioners are in custody since 09.02.2025 and further custody of the petitioners would not serve any fruitful purpose. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioners and submits that four other criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner- Jagdish Bishnoi and two other criminal cases have been registered against the petitioner- Manohar Bishnoi. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioners, especially the fact that alleged recovered contraband MDA is below commercial quantity and trial will take time in its conclusion as well as looking to the period of custody, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow these bail applications. 6. These bail applications are accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioners – 1. Manohar Bishnoi S/o Dhimaram and 2. Jagdish Bishnoi S/o Bhakraram shall be [2025:RJ-JP:11313] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2852/2025] released on bail provided each of them furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that each of them shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioners shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and they shall mark their presence in first week of every month in the concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioners, as directed above. In case the petitioners fail to mark their presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to them by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J MADAN/S-485-486