SHANKARLING S/O SHIVALING KUDAHI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/100713/2025 · 2025-12-08
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85297 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17533 WP No. 100713 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 100713 OF 2025 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
SHANKARLING S/O. SHIVALING KUDAHI, AGE: 63 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O AINAPUR, TQ. KAGWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. VITTHAL S. TELI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, R/BY PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, MINISTRY FOR THE HOME, M.S.BUILDING, BENGALURU 560 001.
2.
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, BELAGAVI DISTRIT, BELAGAVI 590 001.
3.
THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, BELAGAVI, BELAGAVI DSTIRT, BELAGAVI – 590 001.
4.
THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE HIKODI, DIST. BELAGAVI – 590 001.
5.
THE CIRLE POLIE INSPECTOR, ATHANI, ATHANI DIST. BELAGAVI.
6.
THE POLIE SUB INSPECTOR, KAGWAD, POLICE STATION, KAGWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI 591223. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 TO R6;
SRI. H.R.DESHPANDE, ADVOCATE FOR R7 ON I.A.1/25)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR DIRECTION OR
ORDER DIRECTING THE RESPONDENTS REGISTER FIR IN-PURSUANT COMPLAINT DATED
VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Date: 2025.12.11 16:18:07 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17533 WP No. 100713 of 2025
01/10/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-M AND TO TAKE NECESSARY ACTION/STEPS IN PURSUANT TO LETTERS DATED 11/07/2024, 25/07/2024 AND LETTER 10/12/2024 VIDE ANNEXURE-H TO L FOR PROVIDING NECESSARY PROTECTION TO THE PETITIONER AS WELL TO PROVIDE PROTECTION TO CULTIVATE RS NO.634/3 AND 634/6 AND OF AINAPUR, TAL. KAGWAD VIDE ANNEXURE-C AND D AND ETC.,
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1.
Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer: A. “Issue writ of mandamus or direction or order directing the respondents register FIR in-pursuant complaint dated 01/10/2024 vide Annexure-M and to take necessary action/steps in pursuant to letters dated 11/07/2024, 25/07/2024 and letter 10/12/2024 vide Annexure-H to L for providing necessary protection to the petitioner as well to provide protection to cultivate rs no.634/3 and 634/6 and of Ainapur, Tal. Kagwad vide Annexure- C and D. B. Issue any other writ or directions to meet the ends of justice.”
2. This Court, on 21.01.2025, had passed the following
order:
“Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petitioner is in possession of the property and all proceedings against the private respondents have ended against him and in favour of the petitioner.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17533 WP No. 100713 of 2025
The allegation is that, the petitioner is not permitted to harvest the sugarcane that he has grown, despite the orders passed by the concerned Courts in his favour. Therefore, the State shall consider grant of police protection, if need arises, and dispute between the two would turn violent in the real time.”
3. In the light of the said order, it transpires that the police have accorded protection and the petitioner has harvested his crops.
4.
Learned counsel Sri Vitthal Teli submits that the matter would not survive for further consideration. In that light, the petition stands disposed of as having been rendered infructuous.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE
AC/CT-ASC List No.: 2 Sl No.: 50