IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No.1840 of 2025 ------ 1. Mano Devi @ Malo Devi, Aged about 41 years, wife of Mahendra Yadav. 2. Anjali Kumari, aged about 17 years, Daughter of Mahendra Yadav. 3. Puspa Devi @ Pushpa Devi, aged about 31 years, wife of Anand Sharma. All are residents of village Karkend Khatal, P.O. and P.S. Putki, District Dhanbad. .... .... …. Petitioners Versus The State of Jharkhand .... .... .... Opposite Party ------ CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. P.K. Mukhopadhyay, Advocate For the State : Mr. Suraj Deo Munda, Addl.P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 25/03/2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest in connection with Putki P.S. Case No.03 of 2025 instituted under 126(2), 127(2), 121(2), 132, 109, 352, 3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners, in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused persons attempted to murder the informant-Sub-Inspector of Police who went to arrest the minor son of Petitioner No.1. It is submitted that the allegation against the petitioners is false. It is next submitted that all the three petitioners are females. It is next submitted that no injury has been sustained by the alleged informant. It is next submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. Drawing attention of this Court towards para-8 of the instant bail application, learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners have no criminal antecedent. It is also submitted that the petitioners undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case. It is lastly submitted that the petitioners undertake to co-operate with the investigation of the case and to furnish sufficient security including cash security. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privileges of anticipatory bail. Learned Addl. P.P appearing for the State opposes the prayer for anticipatory bail of the petitioners. Considering the submissions of learned counsels and the facts and circumstances stated above, I am inclined to grant privileges of anticipatory bail to the petitioners. Accordingly, the petitioners are directed to surrender in the Court below within eight weeks from today and in the event of their arrest or surrendering, they will be enlarged on bail on depositing Rs.10,000/- each as cash security and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Twenty five thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned C.J.M., Dhanbad in connection with Putki P.S. Case No.03 of 2025 with the condition that they will co-operate with the investigation of the case and appear before the investigating officer as and when noticed by him and furnish their mobile numbers and photocopy of the Aadhar Cards with an undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case and they will not annoy or disturb the informant in any manner during the pendency of the case and further conditions as laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Abhiraj/