HARISINGH NAIK S/O SHEKHAR NAIK, v. STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY,
WP/100487/2015 · 2025-09-11
S R Krishna Kumar
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85253 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85253 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11839 WP No. 100487 of 2015
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR WRIT PETITION NO. 100487 OF 2015 (S-RES)
BETWEEN:
SHRI. HARISINGH NAIK S/O. SHEKHAR NAIK, AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: WATERMAN, MOTIKAL TANDA VILLAGE, TQ: KUDLIGI, DIST: BELLARY.
…PETITIONER (BY SRI. L.T.MANTAGANI AND SRI. N.J.APPANNANAVAR, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF PANCHAYAT RAJ AND RURAL DEVELOPMENT, VIDHAN SAUDHA, BANGALORE.
2.
THE CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER ZILLA PANCHAYAT, BELLARY.
3.
EXECUTIVE OFFICER TALUK PANCHAYAT,
Digitally signed by SAMREEN AYUB DESHNUR Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD
BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11839 WP No. 100487 of 2015
KUDLIGI, DIST: BELLARY.
4.
PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER GRAM PANCHAYAT HYALYA, TQ: KUDLIGI, DIST: BELLARY.
…RESPONDENTS
(BY SRI. ASHOK T.KATTIMANI, AGA FOR R1;
SRI. V.SHIVARAJ HIREMATH, ADVOCATE FOR R2 AND R3;
NOTICE TO R4 IS SERVED)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT AUTHORITIES/RESPONDENTS 2 TO 4 TO RE- INSTATE THE PETITIONER IN THE PLACE WHERE THE PEITITONER WAS DISCHARGING HIS DUTIES BY CONSIDERING 18 YEARS OF LONG SERVICES RENDERED AT THE 4TH RESPONDENT GRAM PANCHAYAT AND DIRECT THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO PAY THE ARREARS OF WAGES FOR HAVING DISCHARGED HIS DUTIES AS A WATERMAN AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11839 WP No. 100487 of 2015
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR)
In this petition, petitioner seeks the following reliefs:
“a. Issue a Writ of Mandamus directing the Respondent Authorities/Respondent Nos.2 to 4 to re-instate the petitioner in the place where the petitioner was discharging his duties by considering 18 years of long services rendered at the 4th Respondent Gram Panchayat.
b. Issue a writ of mandamus directing the 4th respondent to pay the arrears of wages for having discharged his duties as a waterman.
c. Issue any other order or direction as this Hon’ble Court deems fit in the circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice and equity.”
2. After arguing the matter for sometime, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition will be
disposed off reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to submit a fresh/new representation along with relevant documents to the respondents who may be directed to consider the same and pass appropriate orders/take appropriate decision within the stipulated time.
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:11839 WP No. 100487 of 2015
3. Submission is placed on record.
4. The petition stands disposed off reserving liberty in favour of the petitioner to submit a fresh/new representation to the concerned respondents ventilating his grievances. If such a representation is made by the petitioner together with relevant documents, the concerned respondents shall address the grievances of the petitioner and pass appropriate orders/take appropriate decision on the said representation within a period of two (2) months from the date on which the petitioner submits the representation.
Sd/- (S.R. KRISHNA KUMAR) JUDGE
SMM / Ct:vh List No.: 1 Sl No.: 45