- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15732 WP No. 101729 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 101729 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: SHRI. ABDULKHADAR S/O. MUGUTASAB KITTUR, AGE: 76 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O: JAI HIND ROAD ALANAVAR, DIST: DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. SADIQ N. GOODWALA, ADVOCATE) AND: SIRAJ AHMED BY HIS LRS., 1. SMT. SABIHABEGUM W/O. SIRAJ AHAAMAD KITTUR, AGE YEARS, OCC: HOUSE HOLD. 2. ABUSUFIYAN S/O. SIRAJ AHAMMAD KITTUR, AGE: YEARS, OCC: 3. FASIYABEGUM D/O. SIRAJ AHAMMAD KITTUR, AGE: YEARS OCC: 4. RAFAT JAHAN D/O. SHAKIL AHAMMAD KITTUR, AGE: YEARS OCC: 5. AFROJA BEGUM W/O. SHAKIL AHAMMAD KITTUR, AGE: YEARS OCC: 6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD. Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15732 WP No. 101729 of 2025 7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, DHARWAD AND CHAIRMAN, MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE, SENIOR CITIZEN, DHARWAD, DIST: DHARWAD. 8. THE ASSISTANT EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, RURAL SUB DIVISION, DIST: DHARWAD. 9. THE ASSISTANT ENGINEER, O ANDM HESCOM, ALANAVAR, DIST: DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER DATED 25.07.2024 ASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.6 IN NO.MVPSCA/CR-07/2023-24 BY CONFIRMING THE ORDER DATED 03.07.2023 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.7 IN NO.MDBLPSCN/CR/09/2023-24 VIDE ANNEXURE-C. A WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ENDORSEMENT DATED 22.05.2023 ISSUED BY RESPONDENT NO.9 IN NO.AASA/SUM(V)/2022-23/1387 VIDE ANNEXURE-F. A WRIT IN A NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING RESPONDENT 8 AND 9 TO PROVIDE POWER SUPPLY BEARING RR NO.AMP26511 SITUATED AT ALANAVAR DIST. DHARWAD AND ETC., THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15732 WP No. 101729 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This Court, by order dated 15.10.2025, had passed the following direction: “Finally, 10 days’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, showing indulgence as it was a common object that is passed. In the event objections are not complied with, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench earlier, the petitions could be dismissed without showing any indulgence to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, as this would be the last straw of opportunity to comply. List this matter on 29.10.2025. Interim order subsisting, if any, is extended till the next date of hearing.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 206