Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85247 (PNJ)

KHEM BHAHADUR & ORS v. STATE OF HARYANA & ANR

LPA/134/2017 · 2025-04-25

Anupinder Singh Grewal, Lapita Banerji

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 1 KHEM BHAHADUR & ORS STATE OF HARYANA & ANR CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE M Present: Mr. Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the covered by the judgment of this Court in the case 2014 and connected writ petitions Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter is covered by the aforenoted judgment. The appeal is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment passed in CWP No.11710 of 2014 and connected writ petitions, decided on titled as ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others’ Pending 25.04.2025 SwarnjitS Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH LPA-134- DATE OF DECISION: 25.04.2025 KHEM BHAHADUR & ORS Versus STATE OF HARYANA & ANR HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL HON’BLE MS. JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI Mr. Ravinder Malik (Ravi), Advocate for the Mr. Anant Kataria, DAG, Haryana. ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the covered by the judgment of this Court in the case and connected writ petitions, decided on Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter is covered by the aforenoted judgment. The appeal is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment passed CWP No.11710 of 2014 and connected writ petitions, decided on ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others’ Pending applications, if any, also stand (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) (LAPITA BANERJI) Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -2017 DATE OF DECISION: 25.04.2025 … Appellant(s) ... Respondent(s) HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL . JUSTICE LAPITA BANERJI , Advocate for the appellants. Learned counsel for the appellants submits that the instant appeal is covered by the judgment of this Court in the case bearing CWP No.11710 of , decided on 25.03.2025, titled as ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others’. Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter is covered by The appeal is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment passed CWP No.11710 of 2014 and connected writ petitions, decided on 25.03.2025, ‘Sarbans Singh and others Vs. The State of Haryana and others’. stand disposed of. (ANUPINDER SINGH GREWAL) JUDGE (LAPITA BANERJI) JUDGE Yes / No Yes / No appeal is bearing CWP No.11710 of Sarbans Learned State counsel is not in a position to controvert the submission of the learned counsel for the appellants that the matter is covered by The appeal is disposed of in the same terms as the judgment passed , SWARNJIT SINGH 2025.04.29 09:07 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document