Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8524 (JHR)

BAJRANGI MAHTO ALIAS BAJRANGI YADAV v. STATE OF JHARKHAND

B.A./3392/2025 · 2025-08-01

Anil Kumar Choudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

( 2025:JHHC:21632 ) IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI B.A. No. 3392 of 2025 ------ Bajrangi Mahto @ Bajrangi Yadav, aged about 22 years, son of Dindayal Mahto, resident of village Chhota Lusio, Post Office & Police Station –Margomunda, Subdivison Madhupur, District –Deoghar, Jharkhand. … Petitioner Versus State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioner : Mr. Lalit Yadav, Advocate For the State : Mr. Shailendra Kr. Tiwari, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.04 Dated- 01.08.2025 Heard the parties. The petitioner has been made accused in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 corresponding to Cyber Crime Case No. 115 of 2024 registered for the offences punishable under Section 419/420/467/468/471/120B of the Indian Penal Code and under Section 66B/66C/66D/84C of I.T. Act. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the allegation against the petitioner is that the petitioner was involved in cybercrime and he has defrauded the victim Gourav Jain to the tune of Rs.1,67,296/-. It is next submitted that the allegation against the petitioner is false. It is also submitted that one mobile phone along with one SIM Card has been recovered from the possession of the petitioner. It is then submitted that the petitioner has been in custody since 30.06.2024 as is evident from para-01 of the instant bail application. It is further submitted that the petitioner undertakes to transfer Rs.1,67,296/- to the Bank Account of Gourav Jain without prejudice to his defence in this case. It is then submitted that the petitioner also undertakes to co-operate with the trial of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioner be released on bail. Learned Addl. P.P. appearing for the State opposes the prayer for bail of the petitioner. Considering the facts of this case, the above-named petitioner is directed to be enlarged on bail on showing proof of transfer of Rs.1,67,296/- to the Bank Account of Gourav Jain without prejudice to his defence in this case and on furnishing bail bond of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees twenty five thousand) with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Addl. Sessions Judge-II-cum-Spl. Judge, Cyber Crime, Deoghar in connection with Cyber Crime P.S. Case No.70 of 2024 with the condition that he will co-operate with the trial of the case and furnish his mobile number and photocopy of the Aadhar Card in the court below with an undertaking that he will not change his mobile number during the trial of the case. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu-Gunjan/