Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85227 (ALL)

COMMITTEE OF MANAGEMENT SRI PANINIYA GURUKUL v. State of U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/12691/2024 · 2025-09-09

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 12691 of 2024 Court No. - 32 HON'BLE CHANDRA DHARI SINGH, J. 1. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the respective petitioners, without entering into the merits of the case, have made innocuous prayer that since the Chancellor has passed an order dated 22.01.2025 and has taken a different view, remitting the matter to the Vice Chancellor of the University to reconsider the entire dispute in light of the observation made in the order passed by the Chancellor, hence the instant matter may also be remitted back to the Vice Chancellor after setting aside the impugned order and to direct the Vice Chancellor to re-consider or re-adjudicate the entire dispute and pass a fresh order taking into consideration the observation made by the Chancellor in the order dated 22.01.2025. 2. Per-contra, Sri S.K. Srivastava, learned counsel for the respondents- University vehemently opposed the aforesaid instant writ petitions on merit but have no objection if the same be remitted back to the Vice Chancellor to take a fresh decision in light of the order passed by the Chancellor, as stated above. 3. In view of the arguments advanced by the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the parties and also after perusing the averments made in the petition and the order passed by the Chancellor, without entering into the merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the prayer as made by learned counsel for the petitioners. Since the Chancellor has taken a different view and remitted back the entire dispute to the Vice-Chancellor to re-consider or re-adjudicate the same and pass a fresh order therefore, impugned order dated 28.02.2023 of the instant writ petition is set-aside while remitting the matter back to the Vice-Chancellor for reconsideration and passing a fresh Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Lakshman Tripathi Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Shesh Kumar Srivastava Committee Of Management Sri Paniniya Gurukul .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 3 Others .....Respondent(s) order in light of the observation made by the Chancellor in the order dated 22.01.2025. 4. In view of the facts and circumstance of the case, it is directed to the petitioners to file certified copy of the order within two weeks before the Vice Chancellor. Thereafter, Vice Chancellor is directed to pass an appropriate reasoned order(s) in accordance with law expeditiously, preferably, within a period of three months. 5. Accordingly, all the writ petitions are disposed of. September 10, 2025 Atul WRIA No. 12691 of 2024 2 (Chandra Dhari Singh,J.) Digitally signed by :- ATUL KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad