Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85208 (KAR)

SHARANAPPA S/O VIRABASAPPA ULLAGADDI v. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL

WP/109069/2025 · 2025-12-09

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17724 WP No. 109069 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 109069 OF 2025 (GM-KEB) BETWEEN: SHARANAPPA S/O. VIRABASAPPA ULLAGADDI, AGE 69 YEAR, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KARMUDI VILLAGE, POST KARMUDI, YELBURGA, TALUK YELBURGA-583236, DISTRICT KOPPAL. … PETITIONER (BY SRI. PRIYANKA PRAKASH KADAMPUR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL DISTRICT KOPPAL-583231. 2. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, KOPPAL DISTRICT KOPPAL-583231. 3. THE DY. GENERAL MANAGER, TRANSMISSION, GADAG II A TRANSMISSION LIMITED, GURUGRAM-122009 4. KARNATAKA ELECTRICITY POWER TRANSMISSION CORPORATION, TQ: YELBURGA, DIST: KOPPAL-583231. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T.HANUMAREDDY, AGA FOR R1 & R2; SRI. B.S. KAMATE, ADVOCATE FOR R3 & R4) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, IN THE NATURE OF WRIT, QUASHING THE ORDER PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 BEARING NO.KANDAY/ KUM. NUM. 101665/ M.A.G./ 32/ 38/ 2023 DATED 02.01.2024 UNDER INDIAN ELECTRICITY ACT 2003 AND SECTION 10(D) INDIAN TELEGRAPH ACT 1885 VIDE ANNEXURE-B TO THE WRIT PETITION, IN SO FAR PETITIONER IN THIS WRIT PETITION IS CONCERNED & ETC., Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17724 WP No. 109069 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRL. HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the petition and to prefer fresh petition on the same cause of action owing to certain inadvertent omissions in the petition. 2. The memo is taken on record. 3. Liberty so sought is granted and the petition stands disposed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE Vnp / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 78