Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85200 (KAR)

SMT. SEETAVVA W/O. RAJU LAMANI v. SMT. PREMA W/O. VACHAPPA LAMANI

RFA/100436/2025 · 2025-09-15

Ashok S Kinagi

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12094 RFA No. 100436 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 15TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI REGULAR FIRST APPEAL NO. 100436 OF 2025 (DEC/INJ-) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. SEETAVVA W/O. RAJU LAMANI AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. HOMEMAKER, R/O. MACHAPUR TANDA, TAL. KALGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. …APPELLANT (BY SRI. SUNIL S. DESAI, ADV) AND: 1. SMT. PREMA W/O. VACHAPPA LAMANI SINCE DECEASED REPRESENTED BY LR'S SMT. RATNA W/O. DEVARAJ POL AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MACHAPUR TANDA, TAL. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. 2. SMT. RAMAVVA W/O. PEERAPPA LAMANI, AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MACHAPUR TANDA, TAL. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. 3. SMT. LAXMI W/O. SOMU LAMANI, AGE. 43 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MACHAPUR TANDA, TAL. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. 4. SMT. ANASUYA W/O. PEERAPPA LAMANI AGE. 52 YEARS, OCC. HOUSE WIFE, R/O. MACHAPUR TANDA, TAL. KALAGHATAGI, DIST. DHARWAD. …RESPONDENTS THIS RFA IS FILED, PRAYING TO ALLOW THE PRESENT APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 04.04.2024 IN RA NO.13/2023 PASSED BY THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE & JMFC, KALAGHATAGI, THEREBY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Digitally signed by MOHANKUMAR B SHELAR Date: 2025.09.17 15:46:09 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12094 RFA No. 100436 of 2025 25.07.2025 PASSED BY THE CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KALAGHATAGI IN ENDS OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE JUDGMENT WAS DELIVERED THEREIN AS UNDER : CORAM: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI ORAL JUDGMENT (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHOK S. KINAGI) Learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission of this court to withdraw the appeal with liberty to challenge the impugned order before the appropriate proceedings. 2. Memo is taken on record. 3. Accordingly, the appeal is dismissed as withdrawn, with the aforesaid liberty. 4. Office is directed to return the certified copies after retaining the photocopies of the same. 5. In view of dismissal of the appeal, pending I.A’s, if any, do not survive for consideration and the same are disposed of. Sd/- (ASHOK S. KINAGI) JUDGE MBS CT: BSB