Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL REVISION No. - 4728 of 2025 Court No. - 86 HON'BLE NALIN KUMAR SRIVASTAVA, J.
1. At the first glance the present revision is not entertainable as the matter pertains to be the summoning of the accused revisionist under the provisions of SC/ST Act.
2. Meanwhile, learned counsel for the revisionist submits that he wants to withdraw this revision with liberty to file afresh before appropriate Bench, therefore, the same may be dismissed as withdrawn.
3. In view of the above, this revision is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as aforesaid.
4. Certified copy of the documents be returned to the learned counsel for the revisionist as per law. September 1, 2025 Fhd Versus Counsel for Revisionist(s) : Bratendra Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. (Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.) Sugriv And Another .....Revisionist(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Digitally signed by :- FAHAD NIYAZ High Court of Judicature at Allahabad