RSA-3089- IN THE HIG 220 Gurdip Singh Surinder Kau CORAM: H Present: - NIDHI GUP judgment an District Jud No.1/defend dated 10.06. Nakodar. hearing after the present a order dated times i.e. 03.08.2017, lingering on years. On th un-represent of this Court -2013 (O&M) -1- E HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HA RSA Date o p Singh Versus er Kaur and another M: HON'BLE MS. JUSTICE NIDH None. I GUPTA, J. (ORAL) The plaintiff-appellant is in ent and decree dated 24.01.2013 pass t Judge, Jalandhar, vide which the efendant No. 1 was allowed reversi 10.06.2010, passed by the learned C The matter pertains to the year g after the year 2019. Perusal of the order-sheet(s) sh esent appeal was issued by a co-ordin dated 13.10.2014, by. Thereafter, the c i.e. on 16.02.2015, 21.07.2015, 2017, 15.11.2018 and 18.11.2019 ing on for service upon respondent No On the last date of hearing i.e. 18.11.2 resented and following order was pas Court:- ND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH RSA-3089-2013 (O&M) Date of Decision: 13.02.2025 .… Appellant .... Respondents NIDHI GUPTA is in second appeal against the passed by the learned Additional h the appeal filed by respondent reversing the judgment and decree rned Civil Judge (Junior Division), e year 2013 and has come up for t(s) shows that notice of motion in ordinate Bench of this Court vide r, the case was listed for hearing 07 .2015, 03.11.2015, 20.02.2017, and since then, the same is ent No. 2 i.e. for past more than 10 18.11.2019, the appellant had gone as passed by a co-ordinate Bench the onal dent cree ion), RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.14 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment. RSA-3089- to responden counsel for gone un-rep reading of t utterly casua appreciated expended in justice. On and careless counsel is se Court is left prosecution. 13.02.2025 rishu -2013 (O&M) -2- “As per office report, co no. 2 has not been furnished, til Today, there is no repr appellant. In the interest of justice, a In case, the correct add furnished within three weeks issued to respondent no.2 for th It is made clear that no respect, shall be afforded to the As per office report, again fres pondent No. 2 as correct address ha el for the appellant. Today for the consecutive sec represented despite the case havin g of the above facts shows that the casual attitude in his pursuit of the iated that very valuable public tim ded in affording opportunities to the n the other hand, the appellant areless approach. It is clear that ne seriously interested in pursuing th is left with no other option except to ution. Ordered accordingly. Pending application(s), if any, s 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether Reportable , correct address of respondent d, till date. representation on behalf of the ice, adjourned to 20.05.2020. address of respondent no. 2, is eks from today, fresh notice be or the date fixed. t no further opportunity in this o the appellant.” fresh notice could not be issued ess has not been filed by learned ve second time, the appellant had having been called twice. A bare at the appellant has exhibited an he present litigation. It is to be lic time of the Court has been the appellant in the interest of has adopted an utterly casual that neither the appellant nor his uing the present matter. Thus, this cept to dismiss the same for non- any, shall stands disposed of. ( NIDHI GUPTA ) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No RISHU KATARIA 2025.02.14 18:32 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.