SATYA NARAYAN RAMAN AND ORS v. STATE OF RAJ AND ORS
CW/13502/2010 · 2025-03-03
Sameer Jain
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8519 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8519 (RAJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
[2025:RJ-JP:9058] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Civil Writ Petition No. 13502/2010
1. Satya Narayan Raman (Belt No. 7429 HPC) S/o Ramnath Bairwa aged about 37 years, R/o House No. 30, Kalyan Nagar-Third, Tonk Road, Jaipur.
2. Suresh Chandra (belt No. 7996) S/o Shri Mohanlal aged about 40 years R/o H-1, 52, RIICO, Mansarover, Jaipur.
3. Vijay Singh (Belt No. 1648) S/o Shri Devi Ram aged about 39 years R/o Plot No. 13-B, Hanuman Nagar, Keshupra, Ajmer Road, Jaipur.
4. Govind Sharma (Belt No. 5387), S/o Shri Ramavatar Sharma, aged about 34 years, R/o D-37, Path No. 3, Jamna Nagar, Sodala, Jaipur.
5. Kamlesh Verma (Belt No. 773) S/o Shri Ghanshyam Verma aged about 30 years, R/o Shyam Nagar-III, Diggi Road, Sanganer, Jaipur.
6. Prabhakar Chandra Sharma (Belt No. 5484) S/o Late Shri Ramniwas Aged about 42 years, R/o Plot No. 46, Shiv Shankar Colony, Near Sofia Schook, Ghatgate, Jaipur.
7. Mukesh Kumar Bairwa (Belt No. 1540) S/o Shri Sitaram Bairwa aged about 30 years, R/o village Muhana, Tehsil Sanganer, Jaipur.
8. Purushottam Jangid (Belt No. 4915) S/o Shri Ghasiram ji aged about 35 years, R/o Plot No. 47-A, Govindpuri, Gayatri Nagar, 4 Number Dispensary, Sodala, Jaipur. ----Petitioners Versus
1. State of Raj. Through Principal Secretary, Department of Home, Govt. Secretariat, Jaiupr.
2. The Director General Home Guards, City Palace, Jaleb Chowk, Jaipur.
3. The Divisional Commandant, Home Guards Civil Defence and Home Guard Headquarter, Opp. Govt. Hostel Jaipur.
4. The Commandant Home Guards Training Centre, Home Guards Civil Defence and Home Guard Headquarter, Opp. Govt. Hostel, Jaipur. ----Respondents For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Tanveer Ahamad For Respondent(s) :
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SAMEER JAIN
Judgment 03/03/2025
1.
Learned counsel for the petitioner has submitted that instant petition can be disposed of with the liberty to file a representation within a period of 7 days before the Competent Authority.
2. Heard.
[2025:RJ-JP:9058] (2 of 2) [CW-13502/2010]
3. This Court directs Respondents to consider the representation of the petitioner, if filed, and decide the same within a period of 30 days, strictly in accordance with law, expeditiously as per the ratio encapsulated in light of Pawan Meena vs. State of Rajasthan & Ors. (SBCWP No. 1665/2024) and Circular issued by the Chief Secretary for the State of Rajasthan, dated 19.02.2024 (No. i- 10¼1½ izlq-@vuqq-&1@2012).
4. In light of the aforestated, the present petition is disposed of with the aforesaid liberty being granted. Pending applications, if any, stand disposed of.
(SAMEER JAIN),J Pooja /62