Research › Search › Judgment

Madras High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8516 (MAD)

Manoharan Unnithan v. S.Viswanathan

CMP/25919/2025 · 2026-07-20

N Anand Venkatesh

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

C.M.P.No.25919 of 2025 in C.M.A.Sr.No.166352 of 2025 N.ANAND VENKATESH, J This petition has been filed seeking condonation of delay of 432 days in preferring the above appeal. 2. Heard learned counsel for petitioner. 3. Notice sent to first respondent has been returned with an endorsement ‘door locked’. Though notice has been served on respondents 2 and 4, none appeared on their behalf. 4. Ms.C.Harini, learned counsel, takes notice for third respondent. 5. Dr.C.Paranthaman, learned counsel, takes notice for fifth respondent. 6. Satisfied with the reasons assigned in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, this petition is allowed and the delay of 432 days in preferring the above appeal is condoned. 7. Registry is directed to number the appeal, if it is otherwise in order and post it for admission in due course. Registry is also directed to print the name of Ms.C.Harini, learned counsel for third respondent and Dr.C.Paranthaman, learned counsel for fifth respondent at the time of admission. It is made clear that the petitioner will not be entitled for interest for the delay period in the event of enhancement of compensation. 20.07.2026 gm https://www.mhc.tn.gov.in/judis