Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85141 (ALL)

RASHID v. STATE OF U.P.

BAIL/28346/2025 · 2025-09-15

Krishan Pahal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 28346 of 2025 Court No. - 67 HON'BLE KRISHAN PAHAL, J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Sharvan Kumar Yadav, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Shyam Dhar Maurya, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record. 3. By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.167 of 2025, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Kotwali Dehat, District- Saharanpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of one criminal case shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal case have been mentioned in paragraph-7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that there is a criminal history of seven cases against the applicant, which has been explained. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.6.2025. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 5. On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail. 6. Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Shravana Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Rashid .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. .....Opposite Party(s) allowed. Let the applicant- Rashid involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :- (i) The applicant shall not tamper with evidence during trial. (ii) The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witnesses. (iii) The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 7. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted. September 16, 2025 Vikas Verma BAIL No. 28346 of 2025 2 (Krishan Pahal,J.) Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad