Research › Search › Judgment

Calcutta High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8513 (CAL)

RAKIA BIBI v. BIDHANNAGAR MUNICIPAL CORPORATION AND ORS

WPA/2522/2025 · 2025-02-25

Kausik Chanda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

25.02.2025 Sl. No.11(DL) Ct. No.15 srm IN THE HIGH COURT AT CALCUTTA CONSTITUTIONAL WRIT JURISDICTION APPELLATE SIDE W.P.A. No. 2522 of 2025 Rakia Bibi Versus Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation & Ors. Mr. Sumitava Chakraborty, Mr. Snehasish Dey …for the Petitioner. Mr. Sirsanya Bandopadhyay, Mr. Arka Kumar Nag, Mr. Tirthankar Dey …for the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation. Mr. Ansar Mandal, Mr. Tanweer J. Mandal …for the State-Respondents. Mr. Biswaroop Bhattacharya, Ms. Bratati Pramanick …for the Respondent Nos.8 to 14. Mr. Soumen Chaterjee, Mr. H. Rahaman, Mr. A. Singh, Ms. Sumana Mukherjee, Ms. Manju Mondal …for the Respondent No.15. Mr. Sounak Bhattacharya, Ms. Neelanjana Ghorui …for the Respondent Nos.16 to 19. It is the grievance of the petitioner that he has not been provided with a certified copy of the demolition order dated 20th August, 2024 passed by the Bidhannagar Municipal Commissioner. Learned Advocate appearing for the petitioner submits before this Court that the petitioner is inclined 2 to prefer a statutory appeal after the certified copy is served upon him. Learned Advocate appearing for the Corporation submits that the certified copy will be provided to the petitioner within 48 hours from date. In that view of the matter, no further order needs to be passed in this writ petition. Accordingly, WPA 2522 of 2025 is disposed of directing the petitioner to collect the certified copy from the office of the Bidhannagar Municipal Corporation after expiry of 48 hours from date. Urgent certified copy of this order, if applied for, be supplied to the parties on compliance of usual undertakings. (Kausik Chanda, J.)