Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8511 (GAU)

RAKIBUL MIYA @ RAKIBUL HOQUE v. THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR.

AB/547/2024 · 2025-02-18

Manash Ranjan Pathak

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/2 GAHC010044852024 2025:GAU-AS:1745 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) Case No. : AB/547/2024 RAKIBUL MIYA @ RAKIBUL HOQUE S/O LATIF MIYA R/O VILL- BALIDHARI P.S. TARABARI DIST. BARPETA, ASSAM VERSUS THE STATE OF ASSAM AND ANR. REP BY THE PP, ASSAM 2:KHOBIR UDDIN S/O GUTU MIYA R/O VILL- BALIDHARI P.S. TARABARI DIST. BARPETA ASSA Advocate for the Petitioner : MR. N J DUTTA, MR A BASUMATARY,MR. M M ZAMAN,MR N AHMED Advocate for the Respondent : PP, ASSAM, MR K BHUYAN,MR M HAZARIKA,MR. M U E BHUYAN Page No.# 2/2 BEFORE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE MANASH RANJAN PATHAK ORDER 19-02-2025 Heard Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam. 2. Apprehending his arrest, the petitioner, namely, Rakibul Miya @ Rakibul Hoque, son of Latif Miya, resident of Village-Balidhari, P.S.-Tarabari, District- Barpeta, has filed this application under Section 438 CrPC, seeking pre-arrest bail in Tarabari P.S. Case No. 43/2023, registered under section 306 IPC, read with Section 6 of the POCSO Act, 2012. 3. On instruction of the petitioner, Mr. M. Rahman, learned counsel appearing on behalf of Mr. N. Ahmed, learned counsel for the petitioner prays for withdrawal of this pre-arrest bail application, to which Mr. K. K. Parashar, learned Additional Public Prosecutor, Assam has no objection. 4. Prayer is allowed. 5. Accordingly, this pre-arrest bail application stands dismissed, on withdrawal. JUDGE Comparing Assistant