Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8511 (AP)

SYED KHURSHEAD BEGUM & ANOTHER v. SHAIK MOHD.HUSSAIN

SA/701/2001 · 2025-01-30

T Mallikarjuna Rao

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010091902001 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3369] THURSDAY, THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JANUARY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE T MALLIKARJUNA RAO SECOND APPEAL NO: 701/2001 Between: Syed Khurshead Begum & Another ...APPELLANT AND Shaik Mohd Hussain ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Appellant: 1. D SUDARSHAN REDDY Counsel for the Respondent: 1. R SUBBA RAO THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING JUDGMENT: The Second Appeal is preferred by the appellants against the Judgment and Decree dated 15.03.1999, passed in A.S.No.82 of 1996, on the file of the learned District Judge, Cuddapah, reversing and modifying the Judgment and Decree dated 01.10.1996, passed in O.S.No.709 of 1989, on the file of the Principal District Munsif, Cuddapah. 2. None appeared on both sides. 3. On 03.01.2025, this Court directed the learned counsel for the appellants to get ready for disposal of the matter. Despite direction and despite listing the matter under the caption ‘For Dismissal’ none appeared on both sides, today. 4. It seems that the appellants are not interested to prosecute the matter. Hence, this Court has no other alternative except to dismiss the appeal. 5. Accordingly, the Second Appeal is dismissed for default. There shall be no order as to costs. Interim orders granted earlier, if any, shall stand vacated. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, in this appeal shall stand closed. ________________________ T. MALLIKARJUNA RAO, J Date: 30.01.2025 M K K