266 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRM-A-2463-2019 DECIDED ON: 22.04.2025 GULISTA .....APPELLANT VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .....RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Mr. Rahul Jaswal, Advocate for the appellant. SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) The present appeal has been preferred against the impugned judgment dated 31.07.2019, passed by the Ld. Session Judge Panipat, whereby the judgment of conviction and order of sentence dated 31.07.2019, passed by the Ld. Sessions Judge, Panipat, may kindly be modified/set-aside or rectified and the fine and sentence awarded to the respondents is liable to enhanced and the respondent no. 2 to 6 may be convicted under section 379-B and 506 IPC for snatching and for criminal intimidation. Learned counsel for the appellant prays for withdrawal of the present petition. Prayer is accepted. Dismissed as withdrawn. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 22.04.2025 JUDGE Meenu Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MEENU 2025.04.23 18:51 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document