CRM-M-41052-2025 1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA HIGH COURT AT CHANDIGARH 143 CRM-M-41052-2025 Date of Decision 31.07.2025 Ram Singh .....Petitioner VERSUS Union Territory Chandigarh and Others ...Respondents CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE H.S. GREWAL Present: Mr. Bhupinder Singh, Advocate for the petitioner. **** H.S. GREWAL, J. (ORAL) 1. This petition has been filed under Section 528 of BNSS for issuance of directions to respondents No. 1 to 5 as the representations dated 10.06.2025 (P-6 and P-7) are still pending without any action. The respondent No.6 was declared as proclaimed offender second time in complaint No.3100 of 2022 under Section 138 of NI Act filed by the petitioner against the respondent No.6 and order was passed by the Court of JMIC, Chandigarh (Annexure P-5). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner contends that the petitioner has filed a criminal complaint under Section 138 of NI Act against respondent No.6 as cheque issued by him for an amount of Rs.5,50,000/- was dishonoured. The respondent No.6 could not appear before the trial Court on 25.10.2023 despite service and was declared as proclaimed offender and thereafter, he was arrested and appeared before the Court and he was released on bail. After being released on bail, respondent No.6 was again declared as proclaimed offender due to non-appearance but no action has been taken by the police for his arrest ANIL KUMAR 2025.08.07 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRM-M-41052-2025 2 so far as he is residing in District Mohali. In this regard he had made representations (Annexures P-6 and P-7) to Senior Supreintendent of Police, Chandigarh and Senior Superintendent of Police, SAS Nagar Mohali (respondent Nos. 2 and 3 respectively) but no action has been taken in this regard. Learned counsel submits that he would be satisfied if directions are issued to respondent No. 2- Senior Superintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to decide his representations and take appropriate steps at the earliest. 3. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. 4. At the asking of the Court, Mr. Manish Dadwal, Addl. P.P. Union Territory, Chandigarh, accepts notice on behalf of the official respondents. 5. I have heard learned counsel for the parties. 6. Keeping in view the facts and circumstances of the case and the prayer made by the petitioner, the present petition is disposed of with a direction to respondents No.2-the Senior Supreintendent of Police, Chandigarh, to decide the representations (P-6 & P-7) in accordance with law within a period of four weeks from the date of receipt of certified copy of this order. (H.S. GREWAL) 31.07.2025 JUDGE anil Whether speaking/ reasoned: Yes/No Whether Reportable: Yes/No ANIL KUMAR 2025.08.07 10:13 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document