IN THE HIGH COURT OF HIMACHAL PRADESH AT SHIMLA COPC No.277 of 2025 Decided on: 13.08.2025 _________________________________________________________________ Dr. Ashok Kumar ....Petitioner Versus Rakhi Kahlon & Anr …Respondents _________________________________________________________________ Coram Ms. Justice Jyotsna Rewal Dua 1 Whether approved for reporting? _________________________________________________________________ For the petitioner: Mr. Vinay Mehta, Advocate. For the respondents: Mr. Rajat Chaudhary, Assistant Advocate General. Jyotsna Rewal Dua, Judge Learned Assistant Advocate General has handed over a cheque in the sum of Rs.5000/-, drawn in the name of the petitioner, to his learned counsel. 2. A copy of compliance affidavit filed by respondent No.1, was also placed on record, in terms of which, case of the petitioner has been considered and appropriate order has been passed. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that grievance of the has now been redressed, however, liberty be 1 Whether reporters of Local Papers may be allowed to see the judgment? Yes - 2 - reserved to the petitioner to seek appropriate remedy for redressal of his surviving grievances, if any, in accordance with law, in case need so arises in future. 4. Granting such liberty, present contempt proceedings are closed. Notice issued to the respondent is discharged. Pending miscellaneous application(s), if any, also stand disposed of. Jyotsna Rewal Dua Judge August 13, 2025 R.Atal