[2025:RJ-JP:11755] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2924/2025 Raghuveer @ Bhagatram S/o Late Tejram, Aged About 60 Years, R/o Khirkhida, Police Station Kudgaon, District Karauli (Raj.) (At Present Accused Petitioner Confined District Jail Karauli). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Malkhan Chaturvedi For Respondent(s) : Ms. Arti Sharma, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 12/03/2025 1. The instant bail application has been filed under Section 483 of BNSS on behalf of the petitioner, who has been arrested in connection with FIR No.12/2025 registered at Police Station Mamchari, District Karauli for the offences under Section 8/21 of NDPS Act. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 8/21 & 8/29 of NDPS Act. 2. It is contended by learned counsel for the petitioner that the accused-petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. Learned counsel submits that admittedly, no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner and he has been made accused solely on the basis of police interrogation of co-accused persons who were found in possession of 5 gm 48 mg and 5 gm 80 mg smack respectively which are marginally above small quantity. It is submitted that petitioner is in custody since [2025:RJ-JP:11755] (2 of 3) [CRLMB-2924/2025] 10.02.2025. Further custody of the petitioner would not serve any fruitful purpose. Trial will take time in its conclusion. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor opposes the submissions made by the learned counsel for the petitioner. She submits that six other cases have been registered against the petitioner out of which four cases are under the NDPS Act. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by learned counsel for the petitioner, as also the fact that no recovery has been made from the possession of the petitioner; petitioner is in custody since 10.02.2025, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the bail application. 6. This bail application is accordingly allowed and it is directed that accused-petitioner -Raghuveer @ Bhagatram S/o Late Tejram, shall be released on bail provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- (Rupees Fifty Thousand Only) together with two sureties in the sum of Rs.25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand Only) each to the satisfaction of the learned trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before that Court and any Court to which the matter is transferred, on all subsequent dates of hearing and as and when called upon to do so. 7. It is made clear that the accused-petitioner shall not involve in any other offence(s) during currency of the bail and he shall mark his presence in first and third week of every month in the [2025:RJ-JP:11755] (3 of 3) [CRLMB-2924/2025] concerned police station, till trial is concluded. 8. Concerned SHO is directed to maintain a register recording the attendance of the petitioner, as directed above. In case the petitioner fails to mark his presence in the concerned police station, as directed above, the concerned SHO is directed to immediately report the matter to the concerned Court in this regard. 9. If any breach of these conditions is reported or come to the notice of the Court, the same shall alone be a reason for the trial Court to cancel the bail granted to him by this Court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /921