- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17178 WP No. 108964 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE WRIT PETITION NO. 108964 OF 2025 (GM-CPC) BETWEEN: 1. YAMANAVVA W/O YAMANOORSAB, AGE. 75 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 2. SHARANAPPA S/O VEERPANNA BEVINGIDAD, AGE. 61 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 3. BASAPPA @ ADIBASAPPA S/O VEERPANNA BEVINGIDAD, AGE. 57 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. … PETITIONERS (BY SRI. VIJAYKUMAR B. HORATTI, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH Date: 2025.12.10 16:35:51 +0530 - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17178 WP No. 108964 of 2025 AND: 1. SMT. HANUMAVVA W/O SANNA HANUMANTAPPA HUNSIYAL, AGE. 69 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 2. PAKEERAPPA @ PAKEERAJJA S/O SANNA HANUMANTAPPA HUNSIYAL, AGE. 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. 3. BALAPPA S/O MUDI HANUMAPPA MUKKANNANAVAR, AGE. 72 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. HIREBOMANNAL VILLAGE-583 237, TQ. AND DIST. KOPPAL. … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE WRIT IN THE NATURE OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING THE IMPUGNED ORDER ON IA NO.9 DATED 06-NOV-2025 ON THE FILE OF SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CJM, KOPPAL IN O.S. NO.26/2018 PRODUCED VIDE ANNEXURE-F AND ETC. THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17178 WP No. 108964 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that issue involved in the present petition is similar to the issue involved in W.P.No.108957/2025 and further submits that similar order be passed. 2. After considering the submission, the Court is of the view that the petition has to be dismissed. The guidelines laid down in the case of Shadaksharappa Vs. K. Vijayalaxmi and Others1 be followed by the Trial Court to the extent possible. 3. Accordingly, the following: ORDER Writ petition is dismissed. Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE CLK CT:BCK LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 16 1 ILR 2023 Kar 3983