- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13388 WP No. 106998 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 106998 OF 2024 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHRI SHIVAJI S/O MARUTI PATIL AGE. 53 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SHIPUR VILLAGE, TAL. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591309. 2. SHRI ANIL S/O MARUTI PATIL AGE. 50 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SHIPUR VILLAGE, TAL. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591309. 3. SHRI NARAYAN S/O BALU PATIL AGE. 58 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O SHIPUR VILLAGE, TAL. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591309. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SHIVRAJ S. BALLOLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU 560001. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY 2. THE LAND TRIBUNAL, HUKKERI, TQ. HUKKERI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591309. REPRESENTED BY ITS PRESIDENT 3. GANESH S/O RAMCHANDRA JOSHI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O NIPPANI TOWN, TQ. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591237. Digitally signed by SHWETHA RAGHAVENDRA Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13388 WP No. 106998 of 2024 4. RAMCHANDRA S/O GANESH JOSHI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O NIPPANI TOWN, TQ. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591237. 5. BAPU S/O HARI JOSHI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O NIPPANI TOWN, TQ. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591237. 6. NAGESH S/O RAMCHANDRA JOSHI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O NIPPANI TOWN, TQ. NIPPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591237. 7. NARAYAN S/O VISHNU JOSHI AGE. MAJOR, OCC. NOT KNOWN, R/O NIPANI TOWN, TQ. NIPANI, DIST. BELAGAVI 591237. …RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLE 226 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR OF ANY OTHER NATURE, MODIFYING THE OPERATIVE PORTION OF THE ORDER DATED 19/04/1976 PASSED BY RESPONDENT NO.2 IN PROCEEDINGS BEARING CASE NO. TNC.SR.6086 VIDE ANNEXURE-B & ETC. THIS WP COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:13388 WP No. 106998 of 2024 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) 1. Despite the order dated 12.09.2025, office objections have not been complied with. 2. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting the matter. 3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. SD/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE SH, CT-CMU LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 126