APHC010091612017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3520] MONDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF AUGUST TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA MOTOR ACCIDENT CIVIL MISCELLANEOUS APPEAL NO: 1291/2017 Between: 1. S MAHABOOB CHANDI, KADAPA DIST, W/O. LATE MANI BASHA, AGED ABOUT 26 YEARS, MUSLIM, R/O. K. AGRAHARAM VILLAGE, KHAJIPETA MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT. ...APPELLANT AND 1. R PRASADA RAJA NELLORE DIST 4 OTHERS, S/O. HAZARATHAIAH, AGE NOT KNOWN, BUT MAJOR, HINDU, OWNER OF THE LORRY BEARING NO. AP-26-TT-75058, RESIDING AT D.NO. 2/67, A.S. PETA VILLAGE AND MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 2. UNITED INDIA INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS DIVISIONAL MANAGER, DIVISIONAL OFFICE, DHOBIGHAT ROAD, KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT. 3. G RAJA GOPAL, S/O. KRISHNAIAH, AGED 40 YEARS, HINDU, DRIVER OF THE LORRY BEARING NO. AP-26-TT- 7508, RESIDENT OF KULLURU VILLAGE, KALUVAI POST 2 & MANDAL, NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. SHAIK BUJJI, S/O. KAMAL SAB, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, MUSLIM, COOLIE. 5. SHAIK MAHABOOB BEE, W/O. SHAIK BUJJI, AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, MUSLIM, HOUSEWIFE, RESPONDENTS NO. 4 & 5 ARE RESIDENTS OF D.NO. 6-4-51, SUNDARAIAH COLONY, BADVEL TOWN AND MANDAL, KADAPA DISTRICT, BUT PRESENTLY CAME DOWN TO KADAPA, RESIDING NEAR POST OFFICE, RAVINDRA NAGAR, KADAPA CITY AND DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Appeal filed under Order 41 of CPC praying thet the Highcourt may be pleased toagainst the Order and Decree dated 09-03-2017 made in M.V.O.P. No. 228 of 2015 on the file of the Motor Accidents Claims Tribunal-cum-First Additional District Judge, Kadapa IA NO: 1 OF 2017(MACMAMP 2457 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the respondent NO. 4 & 5 not to withdraw more than Rs. 2,00,000/- each, pending disposal of MACMA, and pass Counsel for the Appellant: 1. L J VEERA REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. NAGUMANTRI NAGESWARA RAO 2. The Court made the following: 3 JUDGMENT: The appellant is the 3rd claimant before the learned MACT. 2. Respondent Nos. 1 and 3 remained ex parte before the learned MACT. 3. Learned counsel for the 2nd respondent/Insurance Company is present. 4. Notice was not served on respondent Nos.4 and 5/claimant Nos.1 and 2. 5. Learned counsel for the appellant submits that the appellant intends to withdraw the appeal and has also submitted a court slip stating the reason for withdrawal. 6. In view of the said representation, this MACMA is dismissed as withdrawn. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in the appeal shall stand closed. ____________________________ A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA, J 4th August, 2025 cbn 4 246 HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE A. HARI HARANADHA SARMA M.A.C.M.A.No.1291 of 2017 4th August, 2025 cbn