SMT CHANNAVVA W/O. MARISWAMI MADAR v. PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER
WP/107936/2025 · 2025-11-11
Anant Ramanath Hegde
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85034 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 85034 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15404 WP No. 107936 of 2025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE
WRIT PETITION NO.107936 OF 2025 (LB-RES)
BETWEEN:
SMT. CHANNAVVA W/O. MARISWAMI MADAR, AGE. 41 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O. HANAMASAGAR, TQ. KUSHTAGI, DIST. KOPPAL.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. SHIVANAND MALASHETTI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
PANCHAYAT DEVELOPMENT OFFICER, GRAM-PANCHAYAT, HANAMASAGAR VILLAGE, TQ. KUSHTAGI, DIST. KOPPAL, PIN-583 281.
… RESPONDENT (BY SRI. VIJAYAKUMAR BALAGERIMATH, ADVOCATE)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT, ORDER OR DIRECTION IN THE NATURE OF MANDAMUS DIRECTING THE RESPONDENT/PDO OF GRAM PANCHAYAT HANAMASAGAR TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 20.12.2024 AND 04.07.2025, VIDE ANNEXURE-E AND F RESPECTIVELY AND ISSUE A DIGITAL RTC/E- SWATHU/COMPUTERIZED UTARA PERTAINING TO PROPERTY BEARING NO.2890/6 TO THE PETITIONER, BY ALLOWING THIS WRIT PETITION, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
Digitally signed by CHANDRASHEKAR LAXMAN KATTIMANI Location: HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD BENCH
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15404 WP No. 107936 of 2025
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR JUSTICE ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE)
1. This writ petition is filed seeking writ of mandamus on the premise that the petitioner's representation is not yet considered.
2.
Learned counsel for the respondent would submit that the representation is considered and appropriate order is passed. He would submit that an endorsement is produced along with the memo.
3. Hence, the petition is disposed of as no further
order is required.
4. If the petitioner is aggrieved by the endorsement, it is open to the petitioner to question the same in the manner known to law.
Sd/- (ANANT RAMANATH HEGDE) JUDGE AM/- CT:BCK/- LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 93