IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER 2025 MISCELLANEOUS FIRST APPEAL NO. 102494 OF 2016 (MV) BETWEEN: THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, NEKRTC, RAICHUR DIVISION, REPRESENTED BY DEPOT MANAGER, KSRTC, DEPOT MANAGER, RANEBENNUR, (OWNER AND SELF INSURER OF THE BUS BEARING NO: KA-36/F-1033) THE APPELLANT IS REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, CENTRAL OFFICE SARIGE SADANA, KALABURAGI. ...APPELLANT (By SRI. SHIVKUMAR S. BADAWADAGI, Advocate) AND: SRI. BHEEMAPPA S/O MUGAPPA SURVE, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: BUSINESS, R/O: KARUR, TQ: RANEBENNUR, DIST: HAVERI. …RESPONDENT * * * * * This Miscellaneous First Appeal is filed Under Section 173(1) of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, against the Judgment and Award dated 8TH DAY OF MAY 2015 passed in MVC No.250 of 2014 on the file of the Additional Senior Civil Judge, Additional Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Ranebennur. 2 This appeal coming on this day for orders regarding non-compliance of office objections the Addl. Registrar (General) has passed the following: ORAL ORDER Case is called out No representation. Perused the records vide order dated 30.08.2017 this appeal was dismissed for non-compliance of office objection. Subsequently, recalling appeal was filed by the Appellant before the Hon’ble Court and time was granted to comply office objections. But, till today office objections are not complied. Hence, the appeals stands dismissed for not complying of office objections even after filing of recalling application. SD/- (ADDL. REGISTRAR GENERAL) T By: gtb C By: SO: AR: