Research › Search › Judgment

Patna High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 85018 (PAT)

Dilkhush Kumar @ Raju Kumar v. The State of Bihar

CR. MISC./84719/2024 · 2025-01-28

Prabhat Kumar Singh

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.84719 of 2024 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-96 Year-2024 Thana- PIRI BAZAR District- Lakhisarai ====================================================== 1. Dilkhush Kumar @ Raju Kumar S/o Ramchandra Singh R/o vill and P.O. - Abhaypur, Giri Bazar, P.S. - Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai 2. Sushila Devi W/o Ramchandra Singh R/o vill and P.O. - Abhaypur, Giri Bazar, P.S. - Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai 3. Ramchandra Singh S/o Late Vishnu Singh R/o vill and P.O. - Abhaypur, Giri Bazar, P.S. - Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai 4. Nutan Kumari D/o Ramchandra Singh R/o vill and P.O. - Abhaypur, Giri Bazar, P.S. - Lakhisarai, Distt.- Lakhisarai 5. Moni Kumari D/o Ramchandra Singh, W/o Deepak Kumar R/o vill - Ward no. 12, Palidih, Churamanchak, Churaman Chak, P.s.- Distt.- Begusarai ... ... Petitioner/s Versus 1. The State of Bihar 2. Komal Kumari @ Puja Kumari W/O- Dilkhus Kumar R/O- Abhaypur, P.S.- Piri Bazar, District- Lakhisarai ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Mr. Pritish Kumar Lal, Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Umanath Mishra, APP Mr. Akash Kumar Mishra, Advocate ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE PRABHAT KUMAR SINGH ORAL ORDER 3 28-01-2025 Heard learned counsel for the petitioners, learned A.P.P. for the State and learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in a case punishable for the offence under Sections 85, 105, 238, 351(1) of the Bhartiya Nyaya Sanhita and Section ¾ of the Dowry Prohibition Act. 3. At the outset, learned counsel for the petitioners Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.84719 of 2024(3) dt.28-01-2025 2/2 submits that the dispute between the parties has been settled outside the Court with the intervention of well-wishers and family members, good sense has prevailed between the parties and they have decided to live together, as husband & wife, and petitioner undertakes to keep opposite party no.2 with full respect and dignity. 4. Learned counsel for the opposite party no. 2 does not dispute the contention made by learned counsel for the petitioners. 5. Accordingly, in view of aforesaid facts and circumstances, in the event of arrest/surrender within a period of eight weeks from today, let the petitioners, as named above, be enlarged on bail on furnishing bail-bonds of Rs.10,000/- (ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned Judicial Magistrate-I, Lakhisarai in connection with Piri Bazar P.S. Case No. 96 of 2024, subject to conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the B.N.S.S., 2023. utkarsh/- (Prabhat Kumar Singh, J) U T