- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18056 WP No. 109348 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 11TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 109348 OF 2025 (GM-RES) BETWEEN: 1. SHAKILABEGAM W/O. SHAREEPSAB BADIGER AGED ABOUT 51 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. PURADKERI VILLAGE, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI. 2. SMT. K. M. NETHRAVATHI, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. PURADKERI VILLAGE, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. SUNIL S. DESAI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE, M. S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001. 2. DEPUTY COMMISSIONER DEPUTY COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, HAVERI-581110. 3. ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, OFFICE OF ASSISTANT COMMISSIONERS OFFICE, HAVERI SUB DIVISION, HAVERI-581110. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18056 WP No. 109348 of 2025 4. THE REGULARIZATION UNAUTHORIZED COMMITTEE R/BY ITS CHAIRMAN, RATTIHALLI, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-581110 5. THE TAHASHILDAR, OFFICE OF TAHASHILDARS OFFICE, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-581110 6. REVENUE INSPECTOR, RATTIHALLI, TQ. RATTIHALLI, DIST. HAVERI-581110. … RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE ANY WRIT OF MANDAMUS OR ORDER OR DIRECTION, DIRECTING THE 4TH RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE APPLICATION/REPRESENTATION OF PETITIONERS AS PER ANNEXURE-B FOR REGULARIZATION OF LAND SY NO. 53/5A TO THE EXTENT MENTIONED IN THEIR APPLICATION SITUATED AT CHATNIHALLI VILLAGE, TQ RATTIHALLI DIST HAVERI, IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer: 2. Heard Shri Sunil S.Desai, learned counsel appearing for the petitioners, & Shri T.Hanumareddy, learned AGA appearing for respondents. - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18056 WP No. 109348 of 2025 3. Learned counsel appearing for the parties in unison would submit that, the issue in the lis stands covered by judgment rendered by this Court in Writ Petition No.108621 of 2025, disposed off on 20th November 2025. This Court held as follows: 1. The petitioners are before this Court seeking the following prayer: A. Issue any writ of Mandamus or order or direction, directing the 4th Respondent to consider the application/representation of petitioners as per Annexure-B for regularization of land Sy No. 53/5a, 33 and 62 to the extent mentioned in their application situated at Chatnihalli Village, Tq Rattihalli Dist Haveri, in the interest of justice and B. Grant such other reliefs this Hon’ble court deems fit in the circumstances of this case, with costs. 2. Heard the learned counsel Sri.Sunil S. Desai for the petitioners and the learned AGA appearing for respondent-State. 3. The petitioners are said to be in occupation of certain lands as depicted in the petition right from 11.12.2003. It transpires that the petitioners have submitted representations to the respondent No.4 to consider their cases for regularisation in terms of regularisation of those unauthorised occupancy, in terms of the provisions of the Karnataka Land Revenue Act and other allied Rules. The petitioners are before this Court apprehending that they would be dispossessed without consideration of their cases in terms of their representations under the aforesaid Rules. 4. The learned AGA would submit that if reasonable time is granted, the representations of the - 4 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:18056 WP No. 109348 of 2025 petitioners would meet its consideration and appropriate orders would be passed in accordance with law. 5. In the light of the said submission, without going into the merit of the claim of these petitioners, I deem it appropriate to direct the 4th respondent to consider the representations of these petitioners and pass necessary orders in accordance with law, within 12 weeks from the date of receipt of the copy of the order, if not earlier. 6. All contentions of both the parties shall remain open. 7. In the light of the said submission, till the consideration of the representations the petitioners, if in possession, as on today, shall not be dispossessed from the subject lands. 4. In the light of the issue standing covered by the judgment passed by this Court (supra), on all its fours and on the same reasons, the subject petition also stands disposed. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ANB List No.: 1 Sl No.: 170