Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84991 (KAR)

SRI. SUPRITH S/O ASHOK KUKKIAN v. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF

WP/107794/2024 · 2025-11-17

M Nagaprasanna

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15723 WP No. 107794 of 2024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF NOVEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 107794 OF 2024 (CS-DAS) BETWEEN: SRI. SUPRITH S/O ASHOK KUKKIAN AGE. 39 YEARS, RESIDING AT.22-13 1634 VITTAL RAO RAOD, NEAR MARIGUDI TEMPLE BOFAR, MANGALORE-575001 … PETITIONER (BY SRI. RAKSHITH KUMAR, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE JOINT REGISTRAR OF CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETIES, NO.1119/B, KANABARAGI AREA NEAR RURAL AYURVEDIC COLLEGE AUTONAGAR, BELAGAVI-590015 2. M/S. SAINTE MILAGRIS CREDIT SOUHARDA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KESHAVA SHET ROAD, 1ST CROSS, SONARAVADA, KARWAR-5811304 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER 3. THE AUCTION OFFICER SAINTE MILAGRIS CREDIT SOUHARDA CO-OPERATIVE SOCIETY LTD., KARWAR-5811304, UTTARA KANNADA … RESPONDENTS THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI BY QUASHING IMPUGNED AWARD DATED 11.01.2024 PASSED IN DISPUTE NO.JRD/KA.RA.SOU.SAM.SA.NI/684/2022-23 PASSED BY THE RESPONDENT NO.1 AS PER ANNEXURE – A & etc. Digitally signed by VISHAL NINGAPPA PATTIHAL Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:15723 WP No. 107794 of 2024 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA) 1. This Court, by order dated 15.10.2025, had passed the following direction: “Finally, 10 days’ time is granted to comply with the office objections, showing indulgence as it was a common object that is passed. In the event objections are not complied with, as directed by the Co-ordinate Bench earlier, the petitions could be dismissed without showing any indulgence to the submissions made by the counsel for the petitioners, as this would be the last straw of opportunity to comply. List this matter on 29.10.2025. Interim order subsisting, if any, is extended till the next date of hearing.” 2. Despite the directions issued by this Court, the office objections have not been complied with till date. Accordingly, the petition stands rejected for non-compliance with the office objections. Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE VNP / CT: ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 196