Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84983 (ALL)

SATISH KUMAR UPADHAYAY v. FARZANA KHATOON

A227/8953/2025 · 2025-08-11

Manish Kumar Nigam

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:136311 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 8953 of 2025 Petitioner :- Satish Kumar Upadhayay Respondent :- Farzana Khatoon Counsel for Petitioner :- Ashutosh Shukla,Manish Kumar Tripathi Hon'ble Manish Kumar Nigam,J. 1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record. 2. This writ petition has been filed for following relief: "Issue a suitable writ, order or direction commanding the learned Civil Judge (Senior Division), Varanasi, to positively and finally dispose of Original Suit No. 266 of 2023 (earlier Suit No. 1509 of 2018), Farzana Khatoon vs. Satish Kumar Upadhyay and Others, within a period of six months from the date of receipt of the certified copy of this order, without granting any further unwarranted adjournments." 3. From the perusal of record, it is apparent that earlier also a petition being Matters under Article 227 No. 78 of 2020 (Krishna Chandra Tripathi v. Additional Judge Family Court-II, Allahabad and another) was filed by the petitioner for the same relief which was disposed of by order dated 07.01.2020. 4. In view of the Rule 7 of Chapter XXII of the Rules of the High Court Rules, 1952, second writ petition for the same relief, is not maintainable. 5. Accordingly, the writ petition is dismissed. Order Date :- 12.8.2025 Ved Prakash (Manish Kumar Nigam,J.) Digitally signed by :- VED PRAKASH SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad