AB.HAMID MALLA v. UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K (REVENUE) AND ORS
WP(C)/1827/2025 · 2025-08-04
Rahul Bharti
Writ Petition (Civil)body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8498 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 8498 (JK) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
04 Regular
HIGH COURT OF JAMMU & KASHMIR AND LADAKH AT SRINAGAR
WP(C) 1827/2025 CM(4808/2025)
AB.HAMID MALLA. …Petitioner/Appellant(s) Through: Mr. Tawheed Ahmad, Advocate. Vs.
UNION TERRITORY OF J AND K. ...Respondent(s) Through: None. CORAM:
HON’BLE MR JUSTICE RAHUL BHARTI, JUDGE
O R D E R 04.08.2025
01. This Court cannot entertain this writ petition in the manner in which it has come particularly by reference to the annexure attending therewith.
02. The petitioner has generated a single annexure, tagged as Annexure-I, in which he has attached long line of documents which are all independent and also of different point of time. Such like manner of filing writ petition is not permissible.
03. The Registrar Judicial, Srinagar is directed to ensure that the Examination Counter is directed appropriately that the examination of a petition filed be it writ, appeal or of other nature be done very carefully and not to
entertain such like petition coming forward before getting diarized and presented before the Court for hearing.
04. Learned counsel for the petitioner is allowed to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to file fresh one by proper setting of annexures.
(RAHUL BHARTI)
JUDGE
SRINAGAR 04.08.2025 Bisma