Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84979 (PNJ)

K.S. KAHLON v. PALWINDER SINGH

CACP/76/2025 · 2025-07-31

Kuldeep Tiwari, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

105 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA K.S. Kahlon Palwinder Singh CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE Present: Mr. M.K. Dogra, Advocate ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA 1. This appeal arises out of an order dated 18.07.2025, passed by the learned Single Bench in is imposed towards litigation expenses. 2. Considering the nature of order as also the limited scope available with this Court under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, we do not find any occasion consequently the same is dismissed. 3. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand 31.07.2025 rajesh 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CACP- Date of Decision: Vs. Palwinder Singh HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ASHWANI HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. M.K. Dogra, Advocate for the *** ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA J. (Oral) This appeal arises out of an order dated 18.07.2025, passed by the learned Single Bench in COCP-5419-2024, whereby a cost of Rs.5,0 is imposed towards litigation expenses. Considering the nature of order as also the limited scope available with this Court under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, 1971, we do not find any occasion to entertain the present appeal and consequently the same is dismissed. All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stand (ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) 1. Whether speaking/reasoned? 2. Whether reportable? IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -76-2025 (O&M) Date of Decision: 31.07.2025 …Appellant …Respondent ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA KULDEEP TIWARI for the appellant. This appeal arises out of an order dated 18.07.2025, passed by 2024, whereby a cost of Rs.5,000/- Considering the nature of order as also the limited scope available with this Court under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to entertain the present appeal and All pending misc. application(s), if any, also stands disposed of. ASHWANI KUMAR MISHRA) JUDGE (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No This appeal arises out of an order dated 18.07.2025, passed by - Considering the nature of order as also the limited scope available with this Court under Section 19 of the Contempt of Courts Act, to entertain the present appeal and RAJESH KUMAR 2025.08.01 15:35 I attest the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment.