Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84973 (KAR)

SHAKUNTALA W/O BASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR, v. NEELAWWA W/O KARABASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR,

RSA/5997/2012 · 2025-07-16

M G S Kamal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8812 RSA No. 5997 of 2012 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.5997 OF 2012 (PAR) BETWEEN: 1. SHAKUNTALA W/O. BASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR, AGE: 62 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HIREKOPPA, TQ & DIST: GADAG – 580 023. 2. MAHADEVI W/O. VIRUPAXAPPA GUDDIN, AGE: 38 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KOLIWAD, TQ: HUBBALLI – 580 023. 3. SUMANGALA D/O. BASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR, AGE: 36 YEARS, OCC: ANGANAWADI TEACHER, R/O: HIREKOPPA, TQ & DIST: GADAG – 582 102. 4. MANJULA W/O. SHARANAPPA GAJI, AGE: 34 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: KANAVI, TQ: GADAG – 582 103. 5. MAHESH W/O. BASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR, AGE: 32 YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURE, R/O: HIREKOPA, TQ & DIST: GADAG. …APPELLANTS (BY SRI. P. S. TADAPATRI, ADVOCATE) AND: NEELAWWA W/O KARABASAPPA GIDDAMALLANAVAR, AGE: 28 YEARS, OCC: HOUSEHOLD WORK, R/O: HIREKOPPA, TQ & DIST: GADAG – 582 102. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. K.S.PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS RSA IS FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC PRAYING TO ALLOW THE APPEAL AND SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 15.10.2011 PASSED BY PRL. CIVIL JUDGE (SR. DN) GADAG IN R.A.NO.14/2011 DISMISSING APPEAL BY CONFIRMING THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE PASSED BY THE PRL. CIVIL JUDGE GADAG, IN O.S.NO.225/2007 DATED 04.12.2010 CONSEQUENTLY DISMISS THE SUIT OF PLAINTIFF IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. Digitally signed by SAROJA HANGARAKI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:8812 RSA No. 5997 of 2012 THIS APPEAL, COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.G.S. KAMAL) The learned counsel for the appellant has filed a memo seeking permission to withdraw the appeal. 2. The memo is taken on record. Accordingly, the appeal stands dismissed as withdrawn. Sd/- (M.G.S. KAMAL) JUDGE VB/CT-ASC List No.: 1 Sl No.: 17