WP(C) NO. 26365 OF 2024 1 2025:KER:26420 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KERALA AT ERNAKULAM PRESENT THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE C.S.DIAS WEDNESDAY, THE 26TH DAY OF MARCH 2025 / 5TH CHAITHRA, 1947 WP(C) NO. 26365 OF 2024 PETITIONER/S: BESSY KOSHY AGED 68 YEARS W/O LATE PHILIP KOSHY RESIDING AT ALWIN VILLA PIDAVOOR (PO), KOLLAM, PIN - 689695 BY ADV SALINI T.S. RESPONDENT/S: 1 THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER (INSPECTOR OF POLICE) PATHANAPURAM POLICE STATION PATHANAPURAM, KOLLAM, PIN - 689694 2 MALUMOL.G AGED 36 YEARS D/O LALY GEORGE RESIDING AT 249(60) B, ETTYVILAVEEDU, KALANJOOR PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689694 3 LALY GEORGE AGED 55 YEARS W/O C GEORGE RESIDING AT 249(60) B, ETTYVILAVEEDU, KALANJOOR PO, PATHANAMTHITTA, PIN - 689694 BY ADV NAHAS HABEEB OTHER PRESENT: GP.SRI.B,S.SYAMANTHAK THIS WRIT PETITION (CIVIL) HAVING COME UP FOR ADMISSION ON 26.03.2025, THE COURT ON THE SAME DAY DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING: WP(C) NO. 26365 OF 2024 2 2025:KER:26420 C.S.DIAS, J. --------------------------------------- WP(C) No.26365 OF 2024 ----------------------------------------- Dated this the 26th day of March, 2025 JUDGMENT The writ petition is filed to direct the 1st respondent to afford adequate police protection to the petitioner from the threats of the respondents 2 and 3. 2. The petitioner is the mother-in-law of the 2nd respondent. The 3rd respondent is the mother of the 2nd respondent. The respondents 2 and 3 are mentally harassing and physically torturing the petitioner to grab her properties. Even though the petitioner had complained of the illegal acts of the respondents 2 and 3 to the 1st respondent, no action has been taken in the matter. Hence, the writ petition. 3. Heard; the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Government Pleader and the learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3. 4. The learned counsel for the respondents 2 and 3 submitted that they have not tortured or harassed the WP(C) NO. 26365 OF 2024 3 2025:KER:26420 petitioner as alleged in the writ petition. They have no intention to cause any law and order problem. On a consideration of the facts and the materials on record, I am of the view that a quietus can be given to the writ petition, by permitting the petitioner to approach the 1st respondent and file a complaint, in case there is any threat from the respondents 2 and 3. If such a complaint is filed, the 1st respondent shall act on the complaint in accordance with law, without interfering in any civil dispute between the parties. The writ petition is ordered accordingly. Sd/- C.S.DIAS, JUDGE rkc/26.03.25 WP(C) NO. 26365 OF 2024 4 2025:KER:26420 APPENDIX OF WP(C) 26365/2024 PETITIONER EXHIBITS Exhibit P1 THE TRUE COPY OF THE COMPLAINT SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER BEFORE THE 1ST RESPONDENT