PARMEET KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
CRWP/8192/2025 · 2025-07-30
Sandeep Moudgil
Public Interest Litigationbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84968 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84968 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
112
IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8192-2025 (O&M) DECIDED ON: 30.07.2025 PARMEET KAUR AND ANOTHER
.....PETITIONER(S) VERSUS STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
.....RESPONDENT(S) CORAM:
HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP MOUDGIL Present: Ms. Harpreet Kaur, Advocate for Mr. Varinder Basa, Advocate for the petitioner(s). **** SANDEEP MOUDGIL, J (ORAL) This Criminal Writ Petition under Article 226 for issuance of writ in the nature of mandamus for issuance of direction to official respondents to protect the life and liberty of the petitioners and to restrain the private respondents not to harass the petitioners. Learned State Counsel has submitted that a speaking order has already been passed in the complaint dated 28.07.2025 (Annexure P-6) by the authorities concerned and has produced the copy of the same, which is taken on record. He has furnished a copy of the order to counsel for the petitioners. The relevant part of the speaking order is reproduced below :- ‘Whereas Parmeet Kaur D/o Sohan Singh wife of Karandeep Singh resident of House No. V-31. Hakikat Nagar, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, Anuradha 2025.07.30 23:11 I agree to specified portions of this document
CRWP-8192-2025 (O&M) 2 presently residing at Village Khaira Sultan, Tehsil Dera baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur and Karandeep Singh son of Harpal Singh resident of Village Khaira Sultan, Tehsil Dera Baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur had moved a writ petition bearing numberCRWP-8192 of 2025 before the Hon'ble Punjab and Haryana High Court at Chandigarh. The petitioners have mentioned in their petition that they both are majors and they both are living happily their married life against the wishes of their parents Sohan Singh son of Niranjan Singh and Jaswinder Kaur Wife of Sohan Singh, residents of House No. V-31, Hakikat Nagar, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, now they are apprehending danger to their lives at the hands of above mentioned respondents No.4 and 5 in the writ petition and demanded protection
of
their
life
and
liberty. During the enquiry of petitioners Parmeet Kaur D/o Sohan Singh wife of Karandeep Singh resident of House No. V-31, Hakikat Nagar, Saharanpur, Uttar Pradesh, presently residing at Village Khaira Sultan, Tehsil Dera baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur and Karandeep Singh son of Harpal Singh resident of Village Khaira Sultan, Tehsil Dera Baba Nanak, District Gurdaspur ASI Sawinder Singh visited the village Khaira Sultan, District Gurdaspur. However the petitioners were not found present in the village and gone to Amritsar.
ASI Sawinder Singh had got recorded the statements of the parents of petitioner No.2 and the combine statement of the respectables persons of the village in which it is written that the parents of petitioners No. 1 and 2 have no objection with their married life and they are not even interested where they live and what they do. Keeping in view the abovementioned facts, for the time being no further action is required on this petition and this petition will be filed to record room after Police comes in contact with the petitioners and their police protection will be ensured. In case of dissatisfaction with these speaking orders, Petitioners can file appeal against these orders.’ In light of the above, counsel for the petitioner does not wish to press this petition further. Anuradha 2025.07.30 23:11 I agree to specified portions of this document
CRWP-8192-2025 (O&M) 3 The petitioners would be at liberty to file appeal, as is stipulated in the Standard Operating Procedure, in the light of notification No.HOMEHM-40 40SECM/14/2025-2H4/63 dated 23.01.2025 issued by the Department of Home Affairs, Punjab, Government of Punjab (Home-4 Branch)., in case of any grievance left after passing of the speaking order. Petition stands dismissed as not pressed. (SANDEEP MOUDGIL) 30.07.2025
JUDGE anuradha Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable :Yes/No Anuradha 2025.07.30 23:11 I agree to specified portions of this document