Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8496 (RAJ)

RATAN SINGH S/O VEERSINGH v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

CRLMB/2856/2025 · 2025-02-28

Anil Kumar Upman

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:8994] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR S.B. Criminal Miscellaneous Bail Application No. 2856/2025 Ratan Singh S/o Veersingh, R/o Pradhano Ka Baas, Tehsil Neemaaz, District Pali (Raj.). ----Petitioner Versus State Of Rajasthan, Through PP ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Rajesh Kumar Sain For Respondent(s) : Mr. N.S. Dhakar, PP HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR UPMAN Order 28/02/2025 1. The instant pre-arrest bail application has been filed under Section 482 BNSS filed on behalf of the petitioner, who is having apprehension of arrest in FIR No.824/2023 registered at Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar for the offences under Sections 420 & 406 of IPC. Investigation is being conducted for offences punishable under Sections 420, 406, 467, 468, 471 & 120B of IPC. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that petitioner has falsely been implicated in this case. It is submitted that there is civil dispute between the parties as the said agreement was executed between complainant and co-accused Gulab. It is submitted that petitioner was not beneficiary and he was simply the witness of the document. Learned counsel contends that other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of regular bail by this Court. It is contended that petitioner has no criminal [2025:RJ-JP:8994] (2 of 2) [CRLMB-2856/2025] antecedents. Custodial interrogation of the petitioner is not required in this matter. 3. Learned Public Prosecutor oppose the submissions made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. I have considered the contentions. 5. Having regard to the totality of the facts and circumstances of the case; considering the arguments advanced by the counsel for the petitioner and as also the fact that other co-accused persons have been granted benefit of regular bail by this Court; petitioner was simply the witness of the document, but without commenting anything on the merits/demerits of the case, I deem it proper to allow the pre-arrest bail application. 6. The anticipatory bail application is allowed. The S.H.O/I.O/Arresting Officer, Police Station Beawar City, District Beawar in FIR No.824/2023 is directed that in the event of arrest of the petitioner - Ratan Singh S/o Veersingh, he shall be released on bail, provided he furnishes a personal bond in the sum of Rs.50,000/- with two sureties in the sum of Rs. 25,000/- each to their satisfaction on the following conditions:- (i). that the petitioner shall make himself available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required; (ii). that the petitioner shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the court or any police officer, and (iii). that the petitioner shall not leave India without previous permission of the court. (ANIL KUMAR UPMAN),J CHARU SONI /44