ABHISHEK JADHAV S/O SHYAM JADHAV v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA
WP/102782/2023 · 2025-12-08
M Nagaprasanna
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84946 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84946 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17543 WP No. 102782 of 2023
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA WRIT PETITION NO. 102782 OF 2023 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
ABHISHEK JADHAV S/O SHYAM JADHAV AGE. 24 YEARS, OCC. PAINTING, R/O. BANNI MAHAKALI NAGAR, SETTLEMENT AREA HUBBALLI, TQ. HUBLI, DIST. DHARWAD. …PETITIONER (BY SRI. AVINASH M. ANGADI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME VIDHANA SOUDHA, BENGALURU.
2.
THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE AND SPECIAL EXECUTIVE MAGISTRATE HUBBALLI DHARWAD CITY POLICE COMMISSIONARATE AND THE OFFICE POLICE COMMISSIONER NAVNAGAR, HUBBALLI, DIST. DHARWAD 580009
3.
THE POLICE INSPECTOR BENDIGERI TWON POLICE STATION, HUBBALLI 580009. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. T. HANUMAREDDY, AGA)
THIS WP IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT IN NATURE OF CERTIORARI QUASHING THE ORDER DATED 09/02/2023 BEARING NO.KRA.CHP/VIKADA/HU-DHA/GADIPARU/16/2022 VIDE ANNEXURE-A PASSED BY THE 2ND RESPONDENT IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING B GROUP, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
RAKESH S HARIHAR Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Date: 2025.12.09 11:55:12 +0530
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:17543 WP No. 102782 of 2023
ORAL ORDER
(PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE M.NAGAPRASANNA)
1. The petitioner is before this Court seeking the following prayer.
“1. Issue a writ in nature of certiorari quashing the order dated 09/02/2023 bearing No.Kra.CHP/VikaDa/Hu-Dha/Gadiparu/16/2022 vide Annexure-A passed by the 2nd respondent in the interest of justice and equity.
2. Issue such other writ or give such other direction and pass such other order as this Hon’ble Court deems fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case.”
2. The prayer is seeking to quash the order of externment of the petitioner. The term itself getting over and has rendered the petition infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the petition stands disposed as having become infructuous, reserving liberty to the petitioner to avail of such remedy, as is available in law.
4. In the event of need, the petition stands disposed.
Sd/- (M.NAGAPRASANNA) JUDGE RSH / CT: ASC LIST NO.: 2 SL NO.: 67