SHRI TOPANNA S/O FAKIRAPPA AGADI v. KARNATAKA PULP WOOD LIMITED R/BY ITS C AND M.D.
WP/100622/2024 · 2025-08-01
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84941 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 84941 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9575 WP No. 100622 of 2024
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH
DATED THIS THE 1ST DAY OF AUGUST, 2025
BEFORE
THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ
WRIT PETITION NO. 100622 OF 2024 (S-R)
BETWEEN:
SHRI TOPANNA S/O. FAKIRAPPA AGADI, S/O. FAKIRAPPA AGADI, AGED ABOUT 67 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. DOMMANAL, POST: HIREBASUR, TQ. HANGAL, DIST. HAVERI. …PETITIONER (BY SRIYUTHS. M.S. PATIL, THAVANSHI M.V AND KIRAN M. GOLI, ADVOCATES)
AND:
1.
KARNATAKA PULP WOOD LIMITED REPRESENTED BY ITS CHAIRMAN CUM MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT,
“VANAVIKAS”, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560001.
2.
KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION LIMITED, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR, OFFICE AT, “VANANIKAS, 18TH CROSS, MALLESHWARAM, BENGALURU-560001.
3.
THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FOREST, BIOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENT, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
Digitally signed by V N BADIGER Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9575 WP No. 100622 of 2024
4.
KARNATAKA PULP WOOD LIMITED SUBSIDIARY OF KARNATAKA FOREST DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, DHARWAD DIVISION FOREST COMPOUND, NEAR K.C. PARK, DHARWAD-580008. …RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. P.N. HATTI, HCGP FOR R1 TO R4)
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO I) ISSUE A WRIT A MANDAMUS OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT OR ORDER AS PER ANNEXURE-‘B’ I.E. AS PER FINAL
ORDER DATED 27/01/2022 AS ALREADY BEEN PASSED IN W.P.
NO.106726/2019 DISPOSED ON THE FILE OF HON’BLE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH AND EXTEND THE TIME LIMIT FOR A FURTHER PERIOD OF ONE MONTH FOR SUBMITTING FRESH REPRESENTATION BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN TO RESPONDENT NO.3 AND CONSEQUENTLY DIRECT THE RESPONDENT NO.3 TO CONSIDER THE SAID REPRESENTATION AS SUBMITTED BY THE PETITIONER HEREIN WITHIN A PERIOD OF SIX MONTHS IN ACCORDANCE WITH LAW. II) ISSUE ANY OTHER WRIT OR ORDER OR DIRECTION THAT DEEMS FIT TO GRANT IN THE CIRCUMSTANCES OF THE CASE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY.
THIS WRIT PETITION, COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Learned Additional Government Advocate accepts notice for respondents Nos. 1 to 4.
- 3 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9575 WP No. 100622 of 2024
2. This Court, by order dated 27.01.2022 in W.P. No. 106726/2019, had granted six months’ time to the petitioner to submit a representation, to be considered in terms of the observations made therein.
3. Despite the lapse of nearly three years, the petitioner has not submitted the said representation. It is in that background that the present writ petition has been filed seeking a further period of one month to submit a fresh representation.
4. Although there has been considerable delay and the petitioner has not availed of the benefit of the earlier
order passed by a co-ordinate bench of this Court, I am of the view that, in the interest of justice, some indulgence ought to be extended, particularly considering that the petitioner is a workman employed by the respondent. Accordingly, I pass the following:
ORDER i. The writ petition is allowed in part. ii. The time granted under the order dated 27.01.2022 in W.P. No. 106726/2019 is
- 4 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:9575 WP No. 100622 of 2024
extended by a further period of one month from today. iii. The petitioner shall submit the representation on or before 01.09.2025. iv. Upon receipt of such representation, respondent No. 3 shall consider and dispose of the same in accordance with law by passing appropriate orders within a period of Sixty days thereafter. v. It is made clear that no further extension of time shall be granted. vi. If the petitioner fails to submit the representation by 01.09.2025, the respondent shall be at liberty to take appropriate action as permissible under law, without reference to this Court.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE
VB CT:PA/List No.: 1 Sl No.: 47