CWP IN THE 206 Digamber Singh and others Managing Director CORAM: Present : HARPREET SINGH BRAR 1. of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or directions especially in the nature of respondents pensionary benefit/retiral benefits to the petitioners, which rendered prior to regularization along with arrears with interest @ 24% per annum. 2. that the grievance raised by petitioners No.1 to 5 and petition qua them stand already infructuous. 3. petitioners No.1 to 5 has already been considered rendered as daily wagers have been counted for calculating the qualifying 1 CWP-20329-2023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP- Date of Decision: Digamber Singh and others VERSUS Managing Director and others HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR Mr. Sandeep Thakan, Advocate Mr. Anmol Dutt Sharma, Advocate for the respondents. **** HARPREET SINGH BRAR, J. (Oral) The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or directions especially in the nature of respondents to count daily wages/work charge services for the purpose of pensionary benefit/retiral benefits to the petitioners, which rendered prior to regularization along with arrears with interest @ 24% per annum. Learned counsel for the petitioner that the grievance raised by petitioners No.1 to 5 and petition qua them stand already infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the claim of petitioners No.1 to 5 has already been considered rendered as daily wagers have been counted for calculating the qualifying HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH -20329-2023 Date of Decision: September 26, 2025 .....Petitioner VERSUS .....Respondent HARPREET SINGH BRAR , Advocate for the petitioners. Advocate for the respondents. The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ, order or directions especially in the nature of mandamus directing the daily wages/work charge services for the purpose of pensionary benefit/retiral benefits to the petitioners, which rendered prior to regularization along with arrears with interest @ 24% per annum. for the petitioners at the very outset submits that the grievance raised by petitioners No.1 to 5 has already been redressed and petition qua them stand already infructuous. Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the claim of petitioners No.1 to 5 has already been considered and their past service rendered as daily wagers have been counted for calculating the qualifying , 2025 .....Petitioners .....Respondents The present writ petition has been filed under Article 226/227 of the Constitution of India with a prayer for issuance of an appropriate writ, directing the daily wages/work charge services for the purpose of pensionary benefit/retiral benefits to the petitioners, which rendered prior to submits already been redressed Learned counsel for the respondents submit that the claim of their past service rendered as daily wagers have been counted for calculating the qualifying PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.29 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP service for the purpose of pension and the claim of petitioner No.6 is under active consideration with respondent No.6. Appropriate orders qua petitioner No.6 would be passed within a period four weeks. 4. for the parties miscellaneous applications, if any September P.C 2 CWP-20329-2023 service for the purpose of pension and the claim of petitioner No.6 is under active consideration with respondent No.6. Appropriate orders qua petitioner d be passed within a period four weeks. In view of the submissions made by the parties, the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending miscellaneous applications, if any. September 26, 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned. : Whether Reportable. : service for the purpose of pension and the claim of petitioner No.6 is under active consideration with respondent No.6. Appropriate orders qua petitioner d be passed within a period four weeks. submissions made by both the learned counsel , the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) JUDGE Yes/No Yes/No service for the purpose of pension and the claim of petitioner No.6 is under active consideration with respondent No.6. Appropriate orders qua petitioner learned counsel , the present petition is disposed of, so also the pending (HARPREET SINGH BRAR) PUNEET CHAWLA 2025.09.29 14:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document