Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 84935 (ALL)

KM. RENU v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIA/11442/2025 · 2025-08-10

Mayur Jain Jt Registrar J Listing

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:135027 Court No. - 32 Case :- WRIT - A No. - 11442 of 2025 Petitioner :- Km. Renu Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Avdhesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Chandra Dhari Singh,J. 1. The instant writ petition has been filed seeking the following main prayer:- "i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondent no. 2 and 3 to release the pension of the mother of petitioner in favour of the petitioner in pursuance of the Government dated 12.08.2014." 2. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of petitioner without entering into merits of the case, made innocuous prayer that the petitioner may be permitted to file fresh representation before respondent no.2 and a direction may be issued to him to decide the same in time bound manner. 3. Learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State- respondents vehemently opposed the writ petition on merit, but has not opposed the prayer as made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioners. 4. Heard Sri Avdhesh Kumar, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and Sri Jitendra Singh, learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State-respondents and perused the contents made in the writ petition. 5. Without entering into merits of the case, I am inclined to allow the innocuous prayer made by learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner as no objection made on behalf of learned Standing counsel appearing on behalf of State-respondents. The petitioner is directed to file a fresh representation along with present writ petition as well as certified copy of this order before respondent no.2, Finance Controller, Directorate of Higher Education, Uttar Pradesh at Allahabad within two weeks from today. After receiving the said representation, the respondent no.2 is directed to decide the said representation in accordance with law, expeditiously, preferably within a period of eight weeks from the date of receiving of the said representation. 6. With the aforesaid directions/observations, the present writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 11.8.2025 Radhika (Chandra Dhari Singh, J.) Digitally signed by :- RADHIKA VISHWAKARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad