Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Rajasthan · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8493 (RAJ)

RAMJANI S/O PEERE KHAN v. STATE OF RAJASTHAN

SOSA/422/2025 · 2025-04-07

Inderjeet Singh, Mukesh Rajpurohit

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

[2025:RJ-JP:15507-DB] HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE FOR RAJASTHAN BENCH AT JAIPUR D.B. Criminal Misc (Suspension of Sentence-Bail) Application No. 422/2025 In D.B. Criminal Appeal No.306/2024 Ramjani S/o Peere Khan, Aged About 45 Years, (at Present Aged About 55 Yearas) Resident of Balakheda Police Station Anta District Baran (Raj) (At Present Accused Confined In District Jail, Baran) ---Accused/Appellant Versus State of Rajasthan, Through Public Prosecutor ----Respondent For Petitioner(s) : Mr. Kapil Gupta with Mr. Dharmendra Kumar Mr. Chitransh Saxsena Mr. Ankit Kumar Mr. Sushil Yadav Mr. Abhimanyu Chundawat For Respondent(s) : Mr. Vivek Sharma, Addl. GA HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE INDERJEET SINGH HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE MUKESH RAJPUROHIT Order 07/04/2025 1. This suspension of sentence application has been filed by the applicant along with the appeal. 2. Counsel for the applicant has annexed the certificate under Rule 311 (3) of the Rajasthan High Court Rules to the effect that during the trial, the applicant was on bail and the sentence of life imprisonment has been awarded to the applicant under Section 302/149 of IPC and he is in judicial custody at District Jail, Baran. He further submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated [2025:RJ-JP:15507-DB] (2 of 2) [SOSA-422/2025] in this matter. He further submits that sentence of similarly situated co-accused persons have already been suspended by this Court and hearing of appeal may take long time and prayed that sentence awarded to the applicant may be suspended and he be released on bail during the pendency of the appeal. 3. Learned Additional Government Advocate has opposed the suspension of sentence application. 4. We have heard counsel for the parties and perused the material available on record. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the present case and the fact that the accused-applicant was on bail during trial and the sentence of similarly situated co-accused persons have already been suspended by this Court and the hearing of appeal may take long time, We deem it just and proper to allow this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application. 6. In that view of the matter, this criminal miscellaneous suspension of sentence application is allowed and it is ordered that execution of sentence awarded to the applicant shall remain suspended during the pendency of the criminal appeal and the applicant be admitted to bail subject to satisfaction of the trial Court with the stipulation that he shall appear before this Court on 26.05.2025 and thereafter as and when called upon to do so. 7. Office is directed to send a copy of this order to the concerned trial Court through e-mail/fax for necessary compliance. (MUKESH RAJPUROHIT),J (INDERJEET SINGH),J GARIMA /56