HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 26939 of 2025 Court No. - 29 HON'BLE MAHESH CHANDRA TRIPATHI, J. HON'BLE KUNAL RAVI SINGH, J. 1. Heard Shri Shiv Ram Dubey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel for the State respondents. 2. The instant writ petition is preferred for a direction commanding the respondents to release the compensation amount in favour of petitioner qua the sale deeds dated 05.10.2018 relating to Gata No.696 area 1380.3 sq. meters and Gata No.510 area 0.009583 hectare executed by the petitioner in favour of Ravindra Kumar Mishra, Irrigation Supervisor, Sarayu Nahar Khand-3, Gonda for Executive Engineer, Sarayu Nahar Khand-3, Gonda for Hon'ble Governor, Uttar Pradesh. 3. When the matter is taken up today, Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel has placed detailed instructions dated 18.08.2025 sent by the Executive Engineer, Sarayu Nahar Khand-3, Gonda, which is taken on record. A copy of the instruction is given to learned counsel for the petitioner. 4. Shri Devesh Vikram, learned Additional Chief Standing Counsel, on the basis of the instructions, submits that 0.1660 hec. land of Gata No.696 had been proposed to be acquired for construction of Pachauha Minor. The sale deeds were executed by the petitioner and the banker's cheque nos.065366 dated 11.09.2018 for Rs.282200/- and 065367 dated 11.09.2018 for Rs.1,26,500/- were issued in his favour. Thereafter certain discrepancies were highlighted and consequently the payment of the compensation was Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Rahul Kumar Yadav, Shiv Ram Dubey Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C. Deepak Kumar Yadav alias Deepak .....Petitioner(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Respondent(s) stopped with immediate effect. All the stakeholders were called and the rectification/correction in the sale deed was ensured. In the said proceeding, the petitioner had not participated and on account of non-participation of the petitioner, the said rectification (Titimma) has not been ensured. He further submits that the land in question remains with the petitioner and the same has not been utilized for construction of the canal. After completion of the project, the land of the petitioner is not required and as such, there is no occasion to make payment of compensation to him. He submits that necessary correction/rectification of the sale deed is to be done within a period of three months. 5. In terms of the instructions, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. October 8, 2025 RKP WRIC No. 26939 of 2025 2 (Kunal Ravi Singh,J.) (Mahesh Chandra Tripathi,J.) Digitally signed by :- RAKESH KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad