IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA (251) Sufua Imam State of Punjab CORAM: Present: KULDEEP TIWARI 1. grievance of the petitioner, as sought through the instant writ petition has been redressed, and therefore, he petition. 2. withdrawn. July 15, 2025 Manpreet IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Sufua Imam Versus State of Punjab and others HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE KULDEEP TIWARI Mr. Mohammad Arshad, Advocate for the petitioner. Mr. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Advocate for respon Mr. Harmeet Singh Oberoi, Advocate for respondent No.3. **** KULDEEP TIWARI, J.(ORAL) At the very outset, learned counsel for the petitioner, grievance of the petitioner, as sought through the instant writ petition has been redressed, and therefore, he seeks permission to withdraw the instant Consequently, the instant writ petition is . , 2025 Whether speaking/reasoned Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-20605-2023 Date of Decision : 15.07.2025 …Petitioner Versus ...Respondents KULDEEP TIWARI Advocate for the petitioner. Karunesh Kaushal, AAG, Punjab for respondent No.1. Mr. Ravi Sharma, Advocate for respondent No.2. Mr. Harmeet Singh Oberoi, Advocate for respondent No.3. , learned counsel for the petitioner, submits that grievance of the petitioner, as sought through the instant writ petition has been seeks permission to withdraw the instant writ Consequently, the instant writ petition is dismissed as (KULDEEP TIWARI) JUDGE : Yes/No : Yes/No submits that grievance of the petitioner, as sought through the instant writ petition has been writ ismissed as MANPREET SINGH 2025.07.16 18:18 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment