CRWP-8185 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA 113 Parveen Rani and another State of Punjab and others Coram : Present: Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) 1. the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to responde protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent 8, who are harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order to save their 2. petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 due to the harassment caused by him separately from him, whereas petitioner no.2 is both the petitioners are living in live private respondent danger from respondent no representation dated 2 granting protection to their life and liberty. 3. 8185-2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Parveen Rani and another Versus State of Punjab and others Hon’ble Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj Mr. Shiv Parkash, Advocate, for the petitioners. **** Rajesh Bhardwaj, J. (Oral) The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to responde protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order their prestige in the society. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the petitioners are major and petitioner no.1 is the harassment caused by him, she has no other option but to live separately from him, whereas petitioner no.2 is both the petitioners are living in live-in relationship against the wishes of private respondents. It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend danger from respondent nos.4 to 8. The petitioners have submitted a epresentation dated 24.07.2025 (Annexure P granting protection to their life and liberty. Notice of motion to the official respondents only. - 1 - IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CRWP-8185-2025 Decided on:30.07.2025 ...Petitioners ...Respondents Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for issuance of direction to respondent nos.2 and 3 protect life and liberty of the petitioners from the hands of respondent nos.4 to harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the married with respondent no.4 but , she has no other option but to live separately from him, whereas petitioner no.2 is unmarried. It is submitted that in relationship against the wishes of . It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend . The petitioners have submitted a .07.2025 (Annexure P-3) to respondent no.2 for Notice of motion to the official respondents only. ...Petitioners ...Respondents The petitioners have filed the present petition under Article 226 of nos.2 and 3 to nos.4 to harassing and threatening the petitioners to eliminate them in order Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that both the married with respondent no.4 but , she has no other option but to live unmarried. It is submitted that in relationship against the wishes of . It is further submitted that the petitioners apprehend . The petitioners have submitted a 3) to respondent no.2 for VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CRWP-8185 4. respondent-State 5. value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2 to decide the representation protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. 6. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live July 30, 2025 vinod* 8185-2025 Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the State. Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a direction to respondent no.2- Senior Superintendent of Police, District to decide the representation (Annexure P-3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever by this Court on the validity of their live-in relationship. , 2025 Whether Speaking/Reasoned: Whether Reportable: - 2 - Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Senior Superintendent of Police, District Fazilka 3) of the petitioners and grant them protection, if any threat to their life and liberty is perceived. It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the petitioners from legal action for violation of law, if any, committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever in relationship. (Rajesh Bhardwaj) Judge her Speaking/Reasoned: NO/YES NO/YES Mr. J.S. Arora, DAG, Punjab, accepts notice on behalf of the Without entering upon an exercise to evaluate the evidentiary value of the documents placed on the file, I dispose of the petition with a Fazilka, 3) of the petitioners and grant them It is clarified that this order shall not be taken to grant immunity to the committed by them. This order would not be understood having expressed any opinion whatsoever VINOD KUMAR 2025.07.31 10:56 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document