HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 29450 of 2025 with APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 38445 of 2024 Court No. - 76 HON'BLE VIKRAM D. CHAUHAN, J. 1. On the consent of learned counsels for the respective parties, both the applications are being heard and decided together by a common judgment and order. 1-A. Heard learned counsel for the applicants and learned A.G.A. for the State. 2. Application u/s 528 BNSS has been filed for quashing the entire proceedings of Case No. 484 of 2021 (State of U.P. Vs. Jaypal and Others), in Crime No. 136 of 2020 under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Gabhana, District Aligarh, as well as Charge Sheet No. 20 of 2021 dated 22.01.2021 and cognizance order dated 31.03.2021 pending before Judicial Magistrate-1st District Aligarh, on the ground of Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Chandra Prakash Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : G.A. Jaypal Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) Smt Asha Singh And Another .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) withdrawal application dated 30.04.2025 filed by O.P. No. 2/Informant for withdrawal of Case No. 484 of 2021 (State of U.P. Vs. Jaypal and Others) as much as quash the order dated 30.04.2025 passed in Case No. 484 of 2021. 2-A. Application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed for quashing the entire proceeding of Case No. 484 of 2021 (State of U.P. Vs. Jaypal and Others) in Crime No. 136 of 2020 under Section 498A, 323, 504, 506 I.P.C., Police Station- Gabhana, District Aligarh, as well as Charge Sheet No. 20 of 2021 dated 22.01.2021 and cognizance order dated 31.03.2021 pending before Judicial Magistrate-1st District Aligarh. 3. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that the compromise has already been entered between the parties on 02.09.2025 and the same has been verified by the court concerned on 02.09.2025, therefore, the present case be finally decided. 4. Learned AGA does not dispute the fact that parties have entered into settlement which is duly verified by the court concerned. It is further submitted that he would have no objection in case criminal proceedings are put to an end. He further submits that in view of settlement there is virtually no chance of any conviction being recorded in the criminal proceedings. 5. Having examined the matter in its totality, this Court is of the view that the criminal proceedings in the present case had essentially been an outcome of a matrimonial dispute; and there are no such over bearing circumstances for which the applicants ought to be prosecuted even after the parties has entered into a settlement. Needless to observe that with the present stand of the parties in terms of their settlement, there is practically no chance of recording conviction, even if the case under the F.I.R. in question is put to trial. In other words, entire exercise of trial would only be an exercise in futility. On the contrary, looking to the nature of dispute and the fact that the disputants have compromised and want to proceed peacefully ahead, it would be in the interest of justice that criminal proceedings in question are quashed. 6. It would be unfair or contrary to the interest of justice to continue with NA528 No. 29450 of 2025 2 the criminal proceeding or continuation of the criminal proceeding would tantamount to abuse of process of law despite settlement and compromise between the victim and the wrongdoer and to secure the ends of justice, it is appropriate that the criminal case is put to an end. 7. In view of the fact that the parties do not want to pursue the case any further as stated by them and the fact that matter has been mutually settled between the parties in view of the compromise dated 02.09.2025 no useful purpose would be served in proceeding with the matter further. 8. Thus, in view of the well settled principles of law as laid down by the Hon'ble Apex Court in Parbatbhai Aahir Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayan, (2019) 5 SCC 688, the proceedings of the aforesaid case is hereby quashed. 9. The present application is, accordingly, allowed. September 25, 2025 S.Prakash NA528 No. 29450 of 2025 3 (Vikram D. Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHASHI PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad