Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Jharkhand · body

2025 DAILYLAW 8487 (JHR)

KALI CHARAN RAWANI v. THE STATE OF JHARKHAND

Cont.(Cvl)/214/2023 · 2025-01-03

S N Pathak

Contempt Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI Cont. Case (C) No. 214 of 2023 ---------- 1.Kali Charnan Rawani 2.Shravan Kumar 3.Shankar Prasad ………… Petitioners Versus 1.The State of Jharkhand 2.Sandeep Singh, the Deputy Commissioner Dhanbad, Dist.-Dhanbad, Jharkhand 3.Kuldeep Choudhary, The Deputy Commissioner, Bokaro, Dist.-Bokaro, Jharkhand 4.Naman Priyesh Lakra, The Deputy Commissioner, Giridih, Dist.-Giridih, Jharkhand 5.Manjunath Bhajantri, The Deputy Commissioner, Deoghar, Dist.-Deoghar, Jharkhand 6.Bhor Singh Yadav, The Deputy Commissioner, Godda, Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand 7.Ravi Shankar Shukla, The Deputy Commissioner, Dumka, Dist.-Dumka, Jharkhand 8.Faiz Aq Ahmed Mumtaz, The Deputy Commissioner, Jamtara, Dist.- Jamtara, Jharkhand 9.Ramniwas Yadav, The Deputy Commissioner, Sahebganj, Sahebganj, Dis- Sahebganj, Jharkhand 10.Madhvi Mishra, The Deputy Commissioner, Ramgarh, Dist.-Ramgarh, Jharkhand 11.Nancy Sahay, The Deputy Commissioner, Hazaribagh, Dist.-Hazaribagh, Jharkhand 12.Aditya Ranjan, The Deputy Commissioner, Koderma, Dist.-Koderma, Jharkhand 13.Anjali Yadav, The Deputy Commissioner, Chatra, Dist.-Chatra, Jharkhand 14.Varun Ranjan, The Deputy Commissioner, Pakur, Dist.-Pakur, Jharkhand ………… Opp. Parties ------- CORAM: HON'BLE DR. JUSTICE S.N.PATHAK For the Petitioner : Mr. Rajesh Bhushan, Advocate For the O.Ps. : Mr. Munna Lal Yadav, SC (M)-III ---------- 21/ 03.01.2025 Learned counsel for the opposite parties submits that substantial compliance has been made however, in some of the districts the order has been partly complied with. 2. In view of fair submission of learned counsel for the opposite parties, it appears that substantial compliance has been made and as such no 2 contempt is made out against the opposite parties. The same is hereby dropped. 3. Resultantly, the instant contempt petition stands disposed of. 4. Petitioner is at liberty to move afresh if any grievance is still to be redressed. (Dr. S.N. Pathak, J.) Rohit/-